q2K BHP
Black History Portal
THE BHP WIRE —
HIDDEN TRUTHS
What's New!
THE JOURNEY THROUGH TIME

Explore Black History

Explore the people, places, events, achievements, struggles and stories that shaped our journey.

✊🏾

Civil Rights

Movements, leaders, victories and the continuing fight for equality.

⚙️

Black Inventors

Innovation, patents, science, technology and world-changing contributions.

🏆

Sports

Pioneers, champions, Negro Leagues, records, activism and excellence.

♟️

People

Meet the people whose lives, choices and achievements shaped the journey.

📍

Places

Black towns, communities, institutions and places where history happened.

📜

Events

Moments that changed communities, movements, institutions and the nation.

Enter a person, place, event, or topic.
MY'STORY

The MOVE Fire

This is a personal recollection on the Move fire on May 13, 1985 Philadelphia police fired thousands of rounds at the MOVE house, city officials approved dropping an explosive device on the roof, the resulting fire was allowed to burn, 11 people—including five children—died, and 61 homes were destroyed. Philadelphia City Council later called it a “brutal attack carried out by the City of Philadelphia on its own citizens” and acknowledged that no individual faced criminal consequences for the bombing. One timeline correction worth preserving for the BHP record: the major previous MOVE-police confrontation was August 8, 1978, about seven years before the bombing, not a year or two earlier. Officer James Ramp was killed, other police and firefighters were wounded, nine MOVE members were later convicted, and television cameras recorded police beating Delbert Africa during his arrest. The 1985 MOVE Commission later specifically criticized city planners for failing to adequately use lessons from that 1978 confrontation. And that actually strengthens the point you’re making: 1985 did not happen without precedent or institutional memory. There had already been a deadly confrontation with MOVE, years of conflict, negotiations and police involvement before Osage Avenue.

MORE →
BLACK FACTS
The Truths They Never Taught You...

The Violence That Helped Spark the NAACP

In August 1908, a white mob attacked Springfield, Illinois’s Black community, destroying homes and businesses and lynching two Black men. National outrage over the violence helped spur the movement that created the NAACP the following year.

MORE →
BHP gathered finds from its connected research sources. Showing the 4 strongest Black History matches.
← BACK TO RESULTS
Wikipedia

Arrival theorem

In queueing theory, a discipline within the mathematical theory of probability, the arrival theorem[1] (also referred to as the random observer property, ROP or job observer property[2]) states that "upon arrival at a station, a job observes the system as if in steady state at an arbitrary instant for the system without that job."[3]

Overview

[edit]

The arrival theorem always holds in open product-form networks with unbounded queues at each node, but it also holds in more general networks. A necessary and sufficient condition for the arrival theorem to be satisfied in product-form networks is given in terms of Palm probabilities in Boucherie & Dijk, 1997.[4] A similar result also holds in some closed networks. Examples of product-form networks where the arrival theorem does not hold include reversible Kingman networks[4][5] and networks with a delay protocol.[3]

Mitrani offers the intuition that "The state of node i as seen by an incoming job has a different distribution from the state seen by a random observer. For instance, an incoming job can never see all 'k jobs present at node i, because it itself cannot be among the jobs already present."[6]

Theorem for arrivals governed by a Poisson process

[edit]

For Poisson processes the property is often referred to as the PASTA property (Poisson Arrivals See Time Averages) and states that the probability of the state as seen by an outside random observer is the same as the probability of the state seen by an arriving customer.[7] The property also holds for the case of a doubly stochastic Poisson process where the rate parameter is allowed to vary depending on the state.[8]

Theorem for Jackson networks

[edit]

In an open Jackson network with m queues, write for the state of the network. Suppose is the equilibrium probability that the network is in state . Then the probability that the network is in state immediately before an arrival to any node is also .

Note that this theorem does not follow from Jackson's theorem, where the steady state in continuous time is considered. Here we are concerned with particular points in time, namely arrival times.[9] This theorem first published by Sevcik and Mitrani in 1981.[10]

Theorem for Gordon–Newell networks

[edit]

In a closed Gordon–Newell network with m queues, write for the state of the network. For a customer in transit to state , let denote the probability that immediately before arrival the customer 'sees' the state of the system to be

This probability, , is the same as the steady state probability for state for a network of the same type with one customer less.[11] It was published independently by Sevcik and Mitrani,[10] and Reiser and Lavenberg,[12] where the result was used to develop mean value analysis.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Asmussen, Søren (2003). "Queueing Networks and Insensitivity". Applied Probability and Queues. Stochastic Modelling and Applied Probability. Vol. 51. pp. 114–136. doi:10.1007/0-387-21525-5_4. ISBN 978-0-387-00211-8.
  2. ^ El-Taha, Muhammad (1999). Sample-path Analysis of Queueing Systems. Springer. p. 94. ISBN 0-7923-8210-2.
  3. ^ a b Van Dijk, N. M. (1993). "On the arrival theorem for communication networks". Computer Networks and ISDN Systems. 25 (10): 1135–2013. doi:10.1016/0169-7552(93)90073-D.
  4. ^ a b Boucherie, R. J.; Van Dijk, N. M. (1997). "On the arrivai theorem for product form queueing networks with blocking". Performance Evaluation. 29 (3): 155. doi:10.1016/S0166-5316(96)00045-4.
  5. ^ Kingman, J. F. C. (1969). "Markov Population Processes". Journal of Applied Probability. 6 (1). Applied Probability Trust: 1–18. doi:10.2307/3212273. JSTOR 3212273.
  6. ^ Mitrani, Isi (1987). Modelling of Computer and Communication Systems. CUP. p. 114. ISBN 0521314224.
  7. ^ Wolff, R. W. (1982). "Poisson Arrivals See Time Averages". Operations Research. 30 (2): 223–231. doi:10.1287/opre.30.2.223.
  8. ^ Van Doorn, E. A.; Regterschot, G. J. K. (1988). "Conditional PASTA" (PDF). Operations Research Letters. 7 (5): 229. doi:10.1016/0167-6377(88)90036-3.
  9. ^ Harrison, Peter G.; Patel, Naresh M. (1992). Performance Modelling of Communication Networks and Computer Architectures. Addison-Wesley. p. 228. ISBN 0-201-54419-9.
  10. ^ a b Sevcik, K. C.; Mitrani, I. (1981). "The Distribution of Queuing Network States at Input and Output Instants". Journal of the ACM. 28 (2): 358. doi:10.1145/322248.322257.
  11. ^ Breuer, L.; Baum, Dave (2005). "Markovian Queueing Networks". An Introduction to Queueing Theory and Matrix-Analytic Methods. pp. 63–61. doi:10.1007/1-4020-3631-0_5. ISBN 1-4020-3630-2.
  12. ^ Reiser, M.; Lavenberg, S. S. (1980). "Mean-Value Analysis of Closed Multichain Queuing Networks". Journal of the ACM. 27 (2): 313. doi:10.1145/322186.322195.

Source: Wikipedia. Article content is retrieved live through the MediaWiki API.

No preview image
Wikipedia

Arrival theorem

In queueing theory, a discipline within the mathematical theory of probability, the arrival theorem (also referred to as the random observer property, ROP or job observer property) states that "upon arrival at a station, a job observes the system as if in steady state at an arbitrary instant for the system without that job."

MORE →
No preview image
Wikipedia

Mean value analysis

In queueing theory, a discipline within the mathematical theory of probability, mean value analysis (MVA) is a recursive technique for computing expected queue lengths, waiting time at queueing nodes and throughput in equilibrium for a closed separable system of queues. The first approximate techniques were published independently by Schweitzer and Bard, followed later by an exact version by Lavenberg and Reiser published in 1980. It is based on the arrival theorem, which states that when one customer in an M-customer closed system arrives at a service facility he/she observes the rest of the system to be in the equilibrium state for a system with M − 1 customers.

MORE →
No preview image
Wikipedia

Little's law

In mathematical queueing theory, Little's law (also result, theorem, lemma, or formula) is a theorem by John Little which states that the long-term average number of customers (L) in a stationary system is equal to the long-term average effective arrival rate (λ) multiplied by the average time that a customer spends in the system (W). Expressed algebraically the law is L = λ W . {\displaystyle L=\lambda W.} The relationship is not influenced by the arrival process distribution, the service distribution, the service order, or practically anything else. In most queuing systems, service time is the bottleneck that creates the queue. The result applies to any system, and particularly, it applies to systems within systems. For example in a bank branch, the customer line might be one subsystem, and each of the tellers another subsystem, and Little's result could be applied to each one, as well as the whole thing. The only requirement is that the system be ergodic. In some cases it is possible not only to mathematically relate the average number in the system to the average wait but even to relate the entire probability distribution (and moments) of the number in the system to the wait.

MORE →
No preview image
Wikipedia

Markovian arrival process

In queueing theory, a discipline within the mathematical theory of probability, a Markovian arrival process (MAP or MArP) is a mathematical model for the time between job arrivals to a system. The simplest such process is a Poisson process where the time between each arrival is exponentially distributed. The processes were first suggested by Marcel F. Neuts in 1979.

MORE →
TOPIC OF THE DAY

Greenwood / Black Wall Street

Before the 1921 destruction of Tulsa’s Greenwood District, Black residents had created a remarkable center of business and community life. The district included stores, professional offices, entertainment venues and homes owned by Black citizens. Understanding Greenwood means learning what was built—not only what was burned.

MORE →
TRIVIA QUESTION OF THE DAY

What prosperous Tulsa district became widely known as “Black Wall Street”?

The Greenwood District.