Civil Rights
Movements, leaders, victories and the continuing fight for equality.
q2K BHP
Black History Portal
THE BHP WIRE —
HIDDEN TRUTHS
What's New!
Explore the people, places, events, achievements, struggles and stories that shaped our journey.
Movements, leaders, victories and the continuing fight for equality.
Innovation, patents, science, technology and world-changing contributions.
Pioneers, champions, Negro Leagues, records, activism and excellence.
Meet the people whose lives, choices and achievements shaped the journey.
Black towns, communities, institutions and places where history happened.
Moments that changed communities, movements, institutions and the nation.
Wilmington, North Carolina once had a thriving Black middle class and an elected interracial government. In 1898 white supremacists used violence to overthrow that government, kill Black residents and drive many others from the city.
MORE →Reflects the personal views, recollections, and perspective of the author, Mike Davis.
This is a personal recollection on the Move fire on May 13, 1985
Gig workers are independent contractors, online platform workers,[1] contract firm workers, on-demand workers,[2] and temporary workers.[3] Gig workers enter into formal agreements with on-demand companies to provide services to the company's clients.[4] They are part of the gig economy.
In many countries, the legal classification of gig workers is still being debated, with companies classifying their workers as "independent contractors", while organized labor advocates have been lobbying for them to be classified as "employees", which would legally require companies to provide the full suite of employee benefits like time-and-a-half for overtime, paid sick time, employer-provided health care, bargaining rights, and unemployment insurance, among others. In 2020, California approved by popular vote Proposition 22, which created a third-worker classification of gig-worker-drivers as contractors but maintained certain benefits such as minimum wage and mileage reimbursement.
Gig has various meanings in English, but it has two modern meanings: any paid job or role, especially for a musician or a performer and any job, especially one that is temporary.[5]
The earliest usage of the word gig in the sense of "any, usually temporary, paid job" is from a 1952 piece by Jack Kerouac about his gig as a part-time brakeman for the Southern Pacific Railroad.[6]
In the 2000s, the digital transformation of the economy and industry accelerated due to advances in information and communication technologies, such as the Internet, and the popularization of smartphones. As a result, on-demand platforms based on digital technology have created jobs and employment forms that are differentiated from existing offline transactions by the level of accessibility, convenience, and price competitiveness.[7]
Normally, "work" refers to a full-time job with set working hours and benefits. But the definition of work began to change with shifting economic conditions and ongoing technological advances, and these changes in the economy created a new labor force characterized by independent, contractual labor.[8]
Uberisation or uberization is a neologism describing the commercialization of an existing service industry by new participants using computing platforms, such as mobile applications, to aggregate transactions between clients and providers of a service, often bypassing the role of existing intermediaries as part of the so-called platform economy.[9] This business model has different operating costs compared to a traditional business.[10]
Uberization is derived from the company name "Uber". Uberization has also raised concerns about government regulations and taxation, insofar as the formalized application of the sharing economy has led to disputes over the extent to which providers of services via an Uberized platform should be held accountable for corporate regulations and tax obligations.[11] In 2018, 36% of US workers joined in the gig economy through either their primary or secondary jobs.[12] The number of people working in major economies is generally less than 10 percent of the economically viable population, according in Europe, 9.7% of adults from 14 EU countries participated in the gig economy in 2017, according to the survey. Meanwhile, it is estimated that the gig worker size, which covers independent or non-conventional workers, is 20% to 30% of the economically active population in the United States and Europe.[7]
A 2016 study by the McKinsey Global Institute concluded that across America and England, 162 million people were engaged in some form of independent work.[13] Moreover, their payment is linked to the gigs they perform, which could be deliveries, rentals, or other services.[14]
Because much of gig work can be done online, gig workers find themselves competing with one another in a 'planetary labour market'.[15]
Many factors go into a desirable job, and the best employers focus on the aspects of work that are most attractive to today's increasingly competitive and fluid labor force.[12] Traditional workers have a long–term employer–employee relationship in which the worker is paid by the hour or year, earning a wage or salary. Outside of that arrangement, work tends to be temporary, or project-based, and workers are hired to complete a particular task or for a certain period of time.[16] Coordination of jobs through an on-demand company reduces entry and operating costs for providers and allows workers' participation to be more transitory in gig markets (i.e., they have greater flexibility around work hours).[4] Freelancers sell their skills to maximize their freedom, while full-time gig workers leverage digital service-on-demand platforms and job matching apps to level up their skills.[17] Another example of temporary workers may be digital nomads. Digital nomads lead a mobile lifestyle that combines work and leisure, requiring a particular set of skills and equipment.[18] Gig work enables digital nomads by offering flexible, location-independent job opportunities that can be performed remotely, typically through digital platforms, allowing for a lifestyle of travel and work anywhere with internet connectivity.
It is important to distinguish employment in the sharing economy from employment through zero-hour contracts, a term primarily used in the United Kingdom to refer a contract in which an employer is not obliged to provide any minimum number of working hours to an employee. Employment in the gig economy entails receiving compensation based on a single key performance indicator, such as the number of parcels delivered or taxi lifts conducted. Another feature is that employees can opt to refuse to take an order. Although employers do not have to guarantee employment, and employees can refuse to take an order under a zero-hour contract, workers under such a contract are paid by the hour rather than directly through business-related indicators, as in the gig economy.[19]
Ghost work is a specific type of labor that is typically task-based and invisible to the end user.[20] Ghost workers work on discrete tasks for a company, but they do not have a relationship with the company beyond assignment of the task and the minimal training necessary. A key characteristic of ghost work is completing small tasks to support machine learning or automation.[21]
Cybertariat denotes precarious workers or also impoverished middle classes subordinated to an algorithmic decision-making system.[22] The algorithmic architecture of digital labor platforms is believed to concentrate benefits and reduce the base for subsistence of cybertariat.[22] Cybertariats represents an integration of the digital work with physical space.[23] The cybertariat can work anytime and from anywhere, can be hired and fired at will.[23] The cybertariat workers work mostly anonymously in virtual identity.[23] The term is introduced by Ursula Huws.[24]
Gig workers have high levels of flexibility, autonomy, task variety, and complexity.[25] The gig economy has also raised some concerns. First, these jobs generally confer few employer-provided benefits and workplace protections. Second, technological developments occurring in the workplace have come to blur the legal definitions of the terms "employee" and "employer" in ways that were unimaginable when employment regulations in the United States, like the Wagner Act of 1935 and the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 were written.[8] These mechanisms of control can result in low pay, social isolation, working unsociable and irregular hours, overwork, sleep deprivation, and exhaustion.[26]
According to a 2021 report by the World Health Organization and the International Labour Organization the expansion of the gig economy can be seen as one significant factor for the increase in worker deaths for those who work over 55 hours a week (relative to those who work 35–40), rising from 600,000 deaths in 2000 to 750,000 in 2016.[27] The report found that in 2016, 9% of the world's population worked more than 55 hours weekly, and this was more prevalent among men, as well as workers in the Western Pacific and South-East Asia regions.[27] Work has also been associated with poor mental health outcomes amongst gig workers.[28]
Legislatures have adopted regulations intended to protect gig economy workers, primarily by requiring employers to provide gig workers with benefits typically reserved for traditional employees. Critics of such regulations have asserted that these obligations have negative consequences, with employers almost inevitably reducing wages to offset the increased benefits, or even terminating employment when they have no leeway to do so.[29]
There are several gender differences in gig work, from the number of women participating to the wage gap.[30] Globally, the gender differences in participation of women in the gig economy differ. For example, in the United States, female gig workers account for 55% of the gig workforce.[31] In India, 28% of the gig workforce consists of women.[32] The platform economy has been described as conferring a professional status that allows women to participate in paid work without disrupting social hierarchies and while managing household and childcare responsibilities. The advent of home service providers and beauticians within the gig economy has led to the formalizing and feminization of casual labor, dubbed "pink collar work".[33]
In October 2021, India's first women-led gig workers' strike was led by 100 women agitating outside the office of Urban Company in Gurugram, Haryana, a platform that provides at-home services, protesting "low wages, high commissions and poor safety conditions".[33] This led to a lawsuit being filed by Urban Company against its workers for "instigating violence against the Company". The lawsuit stated that Urban Company was an aggregator connecting customers to independent workers and sought a permanent prohibitory injunction from the court against protests by the Urban Company employees.[34] The protest was eventually called off following the imposition of Section 144 of the Criminal Procedure Code in Gurugram.
The gig economy is ostensibly less gender-segregated worldwide than the traditional labor market. However, women across the world continue to protest against gender gaps such as lower wages and working hours, and the lack of flexibility. The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need for worker protections for women who work in the gig economy for supplemental income.[35]
Gig work has witnessed a similar gendered division to that found in traditional work. The platform economy has particularly attracted female service providers due to the flexibility it offers. For example, 80% of women on DoorDash said that flexibility is the main reason they pursue gig work.[36] One reason for this is that many women need to balance work with familial responsibilities and are therefore more likely than men to participate in gig work due to scheduling reasons.[37] For many women, platform-based food delivery work also provides an opportunity to monetize previously unpaid domestic skills like food shopping.[37]
Platform-based work is also highly segregated by gender. Men in the gig economy typically perform traditionally male tasks, most notably transportation.[38] A study in Australia found that the most common task for male gig workers was driving, particularly for Uber.[38] Women, on the other hand, tend to perform traditionally female tasks like food shopping, care work, cleaning, and creative jobs like graphic design and writing tasks.[38]
There has also been a recent rise in women joining the delivery economy.[37] Women now make up just under half of the delivery people on the Uber Eats platform and DoorDash now reports that 58% of their delivery drivers are women.[36] Aside from the flexibility, women tend to prefer delivery work to ride-sharing work because of safety concerns in being a female driver in ride-sharing services. There have been various accounts of sexual harassment claims filed by female Uber drivers.[39]
A 2019 safety report released by Uber reported 6,000 incidents of sexual assault from 2017-2018 experienced by both riders and drivers.[40] Despite the prevalence of harassment and assault, platforms do little to protect women from bias, harassment, and violence.[40] Some platforms have implemented preventative measures to protect both customers and workers.[40] Most notably, Uber now requires drivers to complete anti-sexual violence training, and their app now includes a 'panic button' feature that connects users to 911 dispatchers; these measures are widely believed to be insufficient.[40] For instance, women often face drunken and disorderly customers and are left to deal with potentially dangerous individuals on their own with little support from platforms, which provide minimal guidelines for how to respond in dangerous situations.[41] Gender stereotypes and customer bias also mean that customers are more likely to challenge women's decisions, making it difficult for female drivers to defend themselves and advocate for themselves in customer interactions.[41]
The way many platforms are designed also pressures workers, particularly women, to sacrifice their safety to maintain their standing on the platform. Platforms like Uber assign work based on the ratings workers receive from customers. Low ratings can result in a worker receiving less work or being removed from the platform entirely, creating an environment where workers often tolerate some level of harassment to avoid a low rating that may jeopardize their earnings.[41]
Assault and harassment also place undue financial burdens on female gig workers. Since gig workers are typically categorized as independent contractors, they are not extended the protections and benefits of traditional employees. For instance, independent contractors are not covered by the United States' Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). As a result, if a worker needs to take time off to recover from harassment or assault that they experienced while working on a platform, the financial burden of that recovery time falls entirely on the worker, which means that many women continue to work under conditions that feel unsafe to avoid a loss of income.[41]
The literature on the gender pay gap in the platform economy is mixed. But many studies show that women continue to earn less than men, even in platform-based economies.[42][43] The gender pay gap for platform-based work is also typically similar in magnitude to the pay gap observed for sectors outside the gig economy.[37] One analysis of Uber drivers in the United States found that on average, women earned about 7% less than their male counterparts.[44] On Amazon's platform, Mechanical Turk (MTurk), which allows companies to hire people to perform simple online tasks that are difficult to automate, women earned about 10.5% less per hour of work than men, largely because women tended to take breaks between tasks rather than working continuously through a series of tasks to accommodate caregiving responsibilities, particularly young children.[45]
Many workers cite flexibility as a primary reason for choosing to engage in gig work, however that flexibility is subject to some limitations that may have gendered impacts. The primary limitation is that imposed by surge pricing. By tying pricing to demand, surge pricing incentivizes workers to be online during high-traffic or high-demand times.[46] Surge pricing times may conflict with non-work commitments like caregiving responsibilities, creating a trade-off between flexibility and higher earnings.[46]
Measuring the size of the gig workforce is difficult because of the different definitions of what constitutes "gig work"; limitations in the methods used to collect data via household surveys versus information from business establishments; and differing legal definitions of workers under tax, workplace, and other public policies.[47]
The emergence of gig work has been linked to broad changes in the economy. Advances in globalization and technology put pressure on companies to respond quickly to market changes. Securing labor through nontraditional arrangements, such as gig work, will enable companies to adjust their workforce size quickly. This can help companies increase their profits. From this point of view, unconventional gig work is a fundamental component of today's economy and is unlikely to disappear anytime soon.[47]
In their book, The Gig Economy, Woodcock and Graham outline four pathways to worker-friendly futures for the gig economy: increased transparency, better regulation, stronger collective organisation of workers, and platforms run as cooperatives or public infrastructures.[48]
When it comes to gig workers in Africa, there are significant variations across different countries. Sub-Saharan Africa accounts for 13% of the world's workforce, and over 85% of employment in Africa is informal.[49]
NITI Aayog defines 'gig workers' as those engaged in work outside of the traditional employer-employee arrangement. In 2020–21, the gig economy was estimated to employ 7.7 million workers, with a projected workforce of 23.5 million by 2029–30. The industry is expected to produce a revenue of $455 billion by 2024.[50] 47% of gig workers are employed in medium-skilled jobs, about 22% in high-skilled jobs, and about 31% in low-skilled jobs.
93% of the Indian population is employed in the informal economy, which depends on local linguistic, ethnic, and regional dynamics and networks.[51] The technologization of informal labor with app-based work has obviated the need to navigate these local systems for work and payment. Rural-to-urban migrants form a majority of the gig workforce, which serves as an intermediary work settlement and an alternative to unregulated contractors who place them at risk of trafficking and other forms of exploitation.[52] Class and caste identities that have historically been excluded from the formal labor market have utilized the gig economy as a means to escape discrimination.[53] However, the term "platform paternalism" has emerged to describe the perpetuation of caste and class hierarchies, trapping workers in jobs with very little security and no potential for long-term growth.[54] For instance, caste-oppressed women continue to dominate low-paying work, such as cleaning and washing in households.[55] BookMyBai, a platform service that helps people hire house-maids and caretakers, has provisions to request workers from specific geographic regions and religions. This has been criticized for perpetuating caste-based discrimination.[56]
The Indian Federation of App-based Transport Workers and the Telangana Gig and Platform Workers Union currently have 36,000 and 10,000 members respectively, including cab drivers, food and grocery delivery workers, and e-commerce delivery persons.[57] Some of the demands of these unions include security benefits, higher base fares, and protection against exploitation by aggregator companies.
In response, the Indian parliament passed new laws guaranteeing social security and occupational health and safety of gig workers in 2020. These laws are yet to be implemented.[58] In its 2021 report, NITI Aayog also recommended fiscal incentives including tax breaks or startup grants for companies with about one-third of their workforce as women and people with disabilities. Securing social protection coverage, improving national statistics on gig and platform work and policy options, and discussing insurance and tax-financed schemes for gig platforms have been delineated as key priorities for the G20 summit 2023, held at Delhi, India.[59] On 24 July 2023, the Rajasthan legislative assembly approved a groundbreaking bill that provides social security benefits to gig workers, making it the first of its kind in India. The Rajasthan Platform-Based Gig Workers (Registration and Welfare) Bill, 2023, aims to enlist all gig workers and aggregators operating in the state, ensuring they receive essential social security protections. Additionally, the bill establishes a mechanism for gig workers to voice and address their grievances.[60]
Gig work is spreading into side jobs and the delivery business. Kakao has hired drivers to build a proxy-driving system, and the delivery team is meeting the surging demand through a near-field delivery service called "Vamin Connect". There is a gig-work platform for professional freelancers, not just for work. The platform, which connects those seeking skilled professionals with those with skills, offers 10 types of services, including design, marketing, computer programming, translation, document writing, and lessons. However, "gig worker" is not yet very welcome in Korea. This is because many "gig workers" have conflicts with existing services, exposing a lack of social and legal preparation.[61]
Gig work in Southeast Asia has been growing rapidly since 2010; according to World Bank estimates in 2019, the gig work population has experienced a consistent 30% annual growth rate.[62]
Although there is already a large informal sector in many Southeast Asian countries, the growing number of gig workers in the region is increasing demand for labor regulations to protect workers from unfair labor practices.[63] The pandemic has highlighted this concern and shone light on the vulnerability of gig workers in Southeast Asia. In Indonesia, ojek drivers in particular were left without either a social safety net or health protection.[64]
The Platform Workers Act regulates gig work in Singapore since January 2025. Worker benefits include higher Central Provident Fund contribution rates, work injury compensation insurance, collective bargaining power through Platform Work Associations, and more.[65][66][67]
In Australia, the gig economy includes services such as ride sharing, food delivery, and various types of personal services for a fee. It is against the law for an employer to classify a worker as an independent contractor when they are, in fact, an employee. Where this happens, the business could be liable for penalties under the Fair Work Act, and have to backpay the entitlements.[68]
When it comes to platform workers in Europe, there are significant differences across countries. The UK has the highest incidence of platform work. Other countries with high relative values are Germany, the Netherlands, Spain, Portugal, and Italy. By contrast, Finland, Sweden, France, Hungary, and Slovakia show very low values compared to the rest. The typical European platform worker is a young male. A typical platform worker is likely to have a family and kids, and, regardless of age, they tend to have fewer years of labour market experience than the average worker. The majority of platform workers provide more than one type of service and are active on two or more platforms. While flexibility and autonomy are frequently mentioned motivations for platform workers, so too is the lack of alternatives.[69]
One controversial issue, though not unique to Europe, is the employment status of platform workers. In most cases, the providers of labour services via platforms are formally independent contractors rather than employees. When asked about their current employment status, 75.7% of platform workers reported being employed (68.1%) or self-employed (7.6%). The labour market status of platform workers is unclear even to workers themselves, and this uncertainty is reflected in policy and legal debates across Europe. While platform work can lower the entry barriers to the labour market and facilitate work participation through better matching procedures and easing the working conditions of specific groups, this type of work often relies on a workforce of independent contractors whose conditions of employment, representation, and social protection are unclear and often unfavourable.[69]
In most EU states, the rules governing contributions and entitlements of social protection schemes are still largely based on full-time open-ended contracts between a worker and a single employer. As a result, workers with non-standard arrangements often do not have the same income and social security protections as workers with standard employer-employee contracts. Modern social protection systems should be adapted to a context of more irregular careers and frequent transitions, linking entitlements to individuals rather than jobs may contribute to this, while fostering mobility and mitigating the social cost of labour market adjustments.[69][70]
In some jurisdictions, legal rulings have classified full-time freelancers in the gig economy who work for a single main employer as workers and awarded them the rights and protections of regular workers. An example is the October 2016 ruling against Uber in Uber BV v Aslam, which supported the claim of two Uber drivers that they should be classified as workers and receive the associated worker rights and benefits.[71]
In 2019, the UK Supreme Court provided guidance on how to categorize "gig economy" workers. The London-based company Pimlico Plumbers lost an appeal against the argument that one of its plumbers was a "worker", i.e., not an employee, but enjoying some "employment" rights such as holiday pay and sickness pay.[72] The Employment Appeals Tribunal ruled that Hermes' couriers are "workers" with certain statutory benefits including minimum wage, rest periods and holiday pay.[73] In 2018, Uber lost a court case which claimed drivers are workers and therefore entitled to workers' rights, including the national minimum wage and paid holiday.[74] Another UK company involved in "worker status" legal cases is CitySprint.[75] On 19 February 2021, the Supreme Court ruled in favour of 25 Uber drivers having "worker status"; the publication Personnel Today suggests that this case establishes "once and for all that in the UK the self-employed app-based driver model is no longer viable".[76]
Many "gig economy workers" have not been able to receive COVID-19 pandemic support funding.[77]
The precarity of work, with the growth of digital applications for the delivery of goods and services, a phenomenon popularly known as uberization, despite occurring in several countries around the world, has gained strength in Brazil, a country affected by deindustrialization and dependence on the service sector.[78]
Despite promises from Brazilian government authorities to enact new laws to regulate the activity, the absence of specific regulations governing this new form of relationship between Brazilian companies and gig workers has increased legal uncertainty and has been a source of social conflict.[78]
In 2020, there was a national strike bringing together delivery workers coordinated by a set of social movements, such as the Entregadores Antifascistas, a collective organisation of gig workers, which mobilized a set of actions and drew the attention of Brazilian society to the problem.[79][80]
According to the IPEA, a government-led research agency, it was estimated that in October 2021, there were 1.4 million gig workers in Brazil.[81]
In 2015, nearly one in ten Americans (8%) earned money using digital platforms to take on a job or task. Meanwhile, nearly one in five Americans (18%) have earned money by selling something online, while 1% have rented out their properties on a home-sharing site. Adding up everyone who has performed at least one of these three activities, some 24% of American adults earned money in the "platform economy" in 2015.[82]
In 2022, the U.S. Department of Labor released a proposal to revise the Department's guidance on determining whether someone is an employee or an independent contractor under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The proposed rule would make it easier for gig workers/independent contractors to gain full employee status.[83] Companies would be required to provide rights and benefits to gig workers/independent contractors equivalent to standard employees. These benefits include the minimum wage, health insurance, Social Security contributions, and unemployment insurance. The rule would replace a previous one enacted under the Trump administration that made it more difficult for a gig worker/independent contractor to be classified as an employee.[84]
Eligible workers of all ages participate in the gig economy. The highest percentage of Americans who report having earned money at least once via gig work through an online platform is among those aged 18-29, at 30%. Participation drops to 18% for individuals between 30 and 49 years of age and is lower than for those 50 and older.[85] The consulting firm McKinsey attributes the difference in participation by age in part to the low barrier of entry into gig work as young adults are still developing marketable skill sets for other lines of work.[86]
The American Enterprise Institute (AEI) finds that, despite a general decline in gig workforce participation with age, approximately 20% of retired Americans participate in the gig economy, primarily by providing services such as tutoring, hosting rentals, caring for pets, and ride-hail driving. AEI states that the increase in gig work participation following retirement is due in part to fear of financial preparedness for retirement, given the increase in life expectancy or the effect of economic decline on the value of retirement accounts. However, AEI also cites boredom as a significant reason for participation, with 96% of gig workers over 65 reporting they feel more fulfilled when they maintain a job they enjoy.[87]
Gig work participation also varies by race in the United States. More non-white Americans report having earned money in the gig economy – 30% of Hispanic adults, 20% of Black adults, and 19% of Asian adults - than their white counterparts, at 12%.[88] The differences in participation by race can be explained in part by individuals' migrant status, as globally, a disproportionate number of migrants report earning money through gig work.[89] 58% of gig workers surveyed said the extra income earned as either "essential" or "important" as opposed to "nice to have".[85] On Uber's Q2 2022 earnings call, 70% of new Uber drivers cited increased cost of living as the primary motivator to join the company.[90]
In 2021, more non-white gig workers expressed concern about their exposure to COVID-19 on the job, at 50%, than their white counterparts, at 38%. A similar difference between races was found among standard workers with respect to their employer’s lack of COVID-19 precautions.[88]
In 2019, the California legislature passed a law (AB 5) requiring all companies to re-classify their gig-workers from "independent contractors" to "employees".[91] (In the US, there are two mutually exclusive employee classifications; the following ballot initiative created a third in California.[92]) In response to AB 5, app-based ride-sharing and delivery companies Uber, Lyft, DoorDash, Instacart, and Postmates created a ballot initiative (2020 California Proposition 22),[93] which won with 60% of the vote and exempted them from providing the full suite of mandated employee benefits (time-and-a-half for overtime, paid sick time, employer-provided health care, bargaining rights, and unemployment insurance - among others) while instead giving drivers new protections of:
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
The companies and their supporters are pitching the initiative as a "compromise" that would create a third employment classification requiring Uber, Lyft, and their ilk to give drivers more perks than the average independent contractor but wouldn't entitle workers to the full benefits of an employee. If it's approved by state voters, the initiative would require the companies to pay their still-independent contractors a minimum wage and vehicle maintenance costs, cover their auto insurance costs, and grant them a health care stipend. It would create a sexual harassment policy for drivers and riders and would require the companies to investigate complaints. It would also create mandatory safety training for any app-based drivers.
At the same time, Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi is pleading his case in Washington, calling in a New York Times op-ed this week for a "third way" for gig workers, between full-time employment benefits and contract work with "almost no safety net." ... This month, Khosrowshahi's op-ed called for ongoing "benefits funds which give workers cash that they can use for the benefits they want, like health insurance or paid time off," rather than employer-sponsored health care or state-mandated paid leave.
Uber says 91 percent of its drivers across the country work fewer than 40 hours per week. Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi said in a blog post this week that if the company were forced to make all drivers across the country employees, for example, it could only support 260,000 full-time roles. That compares to 1.2 million active drivers the company was hosting on its app before the coronavirus pandemic.
November 2020: Californians will vote on Prop 22, a ballot measure majorly funded by Uber, Lyft and DoorDash. Prop 22 aims to keep gig workers classified as independent contractors. The measure, if passed, would make drivers and delivery workers for said companies exempt from a new state law that classifies them as W-2 employees. The ballot measure looks to implement an earnings guarantee of at least 120% of minimum wage while on the job, 30 cents per mile for expenses, a healthcare stipend, occupational accident insurance for on-the-job injuries, protection against discrimination and sexual harassment and automobile accident and liability insurance.
Source: Wikipedia. Article content is retrieved live through the MediaWiki API.
Gig workers are independent contractors, online platform workers, contract firm workers, on-demand workers, and temporary workers. Gig workers enter into formal agreements with on-demand companies to provide services to the company's clients. They are part of the gig economy. In many countries, the legal classification of gig workers is still being debated, with companies classifying their workers as "independent contractors", while organized labor advocates have been lobbying for them to be classified as "employees", which would legally require companies to provide the full suite of employee benefits like time-and-a-half for overtime, paid sick time, employer-provided health care, bargaining rights, and unemployment insurance, among others. In 2020, California approved by popular vote Proposition 22, which created a third-worker classification of gig-worker-drivers as contractors but maintained certain benefits such as minimum wage and mileage reimbursement.
Temporary work or temporary employment (also called gigs) refers to an employment situation where the working arrangement is limited to a certain period of time, based on the needs of the employing organization. Temporary employees are sometimes called "contractual", "seasonal", "interim", "casual staff", "outsourcing", and "freelance"; the terms may also be shortened to "temps". In some instances, temporary, highly skilled professionals (particularly in the white-collar worker fields, such as human resources, research and development, engineering, and accounting) refer to themselves as consultants. Increasingly, executive-level positions (e.g., CEO, CIO, CFO, CMO, CSO) are also filled with interim executives or fractional executives. Temporary work is different from secondment, which involves temporarily assigning a member of one organization to another. In this case, the employee typically retains their salary and other employment rights from their primary organization. Still, they work closely with other organizations to provide training and share experiences. Temporary workers may work full-time or part-time depending on the individual situation. In some instances, temporary workers receive benefits (such as health insurance), but usually benefits are only given to permanent employees as a cost-cutting measure by the employer to save money. Not all temporary employees find jobs through a temporary employment agency. With the rise of the Internet and gig economy (a labor market characterized by the prevalence of short-term contracts or freelance work as opposed to permanent jobs), many workers are now finding short-term jobs through freelance marketplaces: a situation that brings into being a global market for work. A temporary work agency, temp agency or temporary staffing firm finds and retains workers. Other companies in need of short-term workers contract with the temporary work agency to send temporary workers, or temps, on assignments to work at the other companies. Temporary employees are also used in cyclical work, requiring frequent staffing adjustments.
The platform economy encompasses economic and social activities facilitated by digital platforms. These platforms — such as Amazon, Airbnb, Uber, Microsoft and Google — serve as intermediaries between various groups of users, enabling interactions, transactions, collaboration, and innovation. The platform economy has experienced rapid growth, disrupting traditional business models and contributing significantly to the global economy. Platform businesses are characterized by their reliance on network effects, where the platform's value increases as more users join. This has allowed many platform companies to scale quickly and achieve global influence. Platform economies have also introduced novel challenges, such as the rise of precarious work arrangements in the gig economy, reduced labor protections, and concerns about tax evasion by platform operators. In addition, critics argue that platforms contribute to market concentration and increase inequality. Historically, platforms have roots in pre-digital economic systems, with examples of matchmaking and exchange-based systems dating back millennia. However, the rise of the internet in the 1990s enabled the rapid expansion of online platforms, starting with pioneers like Craigslist and eBay. Since the 2008 financial crisis, the platform economy has further expanded with the growth of sharing economy services like Airbnb and labor market platforms such as TaskRabbit. The increasing prominence of platforms has attracted attention from scholars, governments, and regulators, with many early assessments praising their potential to enhance productivity and create new markets. In recent years, concerns about the social and economic impacts of the platform economy have grown. Critics have highlighted issues such as technological unemployment, the displacement of traditional jobs with precarious forms of labor, and declining tax revenues. Some scholars and policymakers have also raised alarms about the potential psychological effects of excessive platform use and its impact on social cohesion. As a result, there has been a shift towards more regulatory scrutiny of platforms, particularly in the European Union, where new regulations have been proposed to ensure fair competition and worker protections. Despite these challenges, platforms continue to be a dominant force in the global economy, with ongoing debates about how best to manage their influence.
California Assembly Bill 5 or AB 5 is a state statute that expands a landmark Supreme Court of California case from 2018, Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court ("Dynamex"). In that case, the court held that most wage-earning workers are employees and ought to be classified as such, and that the burden of proof for classifying individuals as independent contractors belongs to the hiring entity. AB 5 extends that decision to all workers. It entitles them to be classified as employees with the usual labor protections, such as minimum wage laws, sick leave, and unemployment and workers' compensation benefits, which do not apply to independent contractors. Concerns over employee misclassification, especially in the gig economy, drove support for the bill, but it remains divisive. The law codifies and expands the scope of the so-called "ABC test", established in the Dynamex ruling. That test states that a worker must be classified as an employee, and not a contractor, unless the employment meets all of the following conditions: (A) the individual operates free from the company's direction and control, both in the contract and in reality; (B) the service is performed outside the usual course of business of the employer; and (C) the individual is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, profession, or business of the same nature as that involved in the service performed. In response to the passage of AB 5, many industries began to lobby for exemptions. Approximately 100 professions were specifically exempted from AB5; generally these professions are seen to work directly with and set their own prices to customers. The ridesharing companies Uber and Lyft both lobbied heavily against passage of the bill, and after it was passed they lobbied unsuccessfully to get the California legislature to exempt ridesharing from the bill. They (along with food delivery company DoorDash) also refused, after the bill's passage, to reclassify their drivers as employees. The three companies, now also joined by Instacart and Postmates, funded a ballot initiative, Proposition 22, to exempt both ridesharing and delivery companies from the AB 5 requirements, while also giving drivers some new protections, including minimum wage and per-mile expense reimbursement. Proposition 22 passed in November 2020 with 59% of the vote.
Before the 1921 destruction of Tulsa’s Greenwood District, Black residents had created a remarkable center of business and community life. The district included stores, professional offices, entertainment venues and homes owned by Black citizens. Understanding Greenwood means learning what was built—not only what was burned.
MORE →The Greenwood District.
