Civil Rights
Movements, leaders, victories and the continuing fight for equality.
q2K BHP
Black History Portal
THE BHP WIRE —
HIDDEN TRUTHS
What's New!
Explore the people, places, events, achievements, struggles and stories that shaped our journey.
Movements, leaders, victories and the continuing fight for equality.
Innovation, patents, science, technology and world-changing contributions.
Pioneers, champions, Negro Leagues, records, activism and excellence.
Meet the people whose lives, choices and achievements shaped the journey.
Black towns, communities, institutions and places where history happened.
Moments that changed communities, movements, institutions and the nation.
In August 1908, a white mob attacked Springfield, Illinois’s Black community, destroying homes and businesses and lynching two Black men. National outrage over the violence helped spur the movement that created the NAACP the following year.
MORE →Reflects the personal views, recollections, and perspective of the author, Mike Davis.
This is a personal recollection on the Move fire on May 13, 1985
 | This article needs more citations. (July 2013) |
| Part of a series on |
| War |
|---|
 |
Military administration identifies both the techniques and systems used by military departments, agencies, and armed services involved in managing the armed forces. It describes the processes that take place within military organisations outside combat, particularly in managing military personnel, their training, and services they are provided with as part of their military service.
In cases of military government, for example during a military occupation, the management and control of civilians, and provision of services to them, may also be in scope.
In many ways military administration serves the same role as public administration in the civil society, and is often cited as a source of bureaucracy in the government as a whole. Given the wide area of application, military administration is often qualified by specific areas of application within the military, such as logistics administration, administration of doctrine development or military reform administration.[1]
The development of military administration reflects broader changes in state formation, bureaucratic organisation, and the professionalisation of armed forces.
In pre-modern societies, military administration was often informal and closely tied to personal rule, feudal obligation, or temporary mobilisation. Logistics, recruitment, and finance were managed through informal arrangements rather than standing institutions. Classical empires such as the Roman Empire developed more systematic administrative structures to support large, permanent forces, including standardised pay systems, supply chains, and record-keeping whose administrative capacity was a key factor in sustaining imperial military power.[2][3]
From the early modern period onwards, the growth of centralised states in Europe transformed military administration into a more formalised and bureaucratic system. The emergence of standing armies required permanent institutions for recruitment, training, procurement, and finance. Developments in taxation and public accounting were closely linked to military needs, reinforcing what scholars describe as the “fiscal-military state”.[4]
By the 19th century, industrialisation further reshaped military administration, introducing standardised procedures, professional officer corps, staff systems, and increasingly complex logistical networks. The Prussian General Staff model became influential in structuring operational planning and administrative coordination, illustrating the integration of expertise into military governance.[5]
In the 20th and 21st centuries, military administration has expanded beyond traditional personnel and logistics functions to include large-scale civilian oversight, defence procurement systems, legal frameworks, and interagency coordination. The rise of total war in the World Wars and global tensions throughout the Cold War significantly enlarged administrative structures, embedding military institutions within broader national bureaucracies.
Post–Cold War reforms in many states have emphasised efficiency, accountability, and civilian control, often drawing on public administration theory and management practices. Contemporary military administration increasingly addresses cyber operations, multinational coalition coordination, and complex global supply chains, reflecting both technological change and evolving security environments. Overall, military administration has shifted from localised and personalised arrangements to highly institutionalised, professionalised, and interdependent systems embedded within modern states.[6]
| By type of organization | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| By focus, within an organization |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Positions | |||||||||||||||||||
| Methods, approaches | |||||||||||||||||||
| Skills, activities | |||||||||||||||||||
| Pioneers, scholars | |||||||||||||||||||
| Education | |||||||||||||||||||
| Degrees | |||||||||||||||||||
| Other |
| ||||||||||||||||||
 | This military-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by adding missing information. |
Source: Wikipedia. Article content is retrieved live through the MediaWiki API.
Military administration identifies both the techniques and systems used by military departments, agencies, and armed services involved in managing the armed forces. It describes the processes that take place within military organisations outside combat, particularly in managing military personnel, their training, and services they are provided with as part of their military service. In cases of military government, for example during a military occupation, the management and control of civilians, and provision of services to them, may also be in scope. In many ways military administration serves the same role as public administration in the civil society, and is often cited as a source of bureaucracy in the government as a whole. Given the wide area of application, military administration is often qualified by specific areas of application within the military, such as logistics administration, administration of doctrine development or military reform administration.
The Military Administration in France was an interim occupation authority established by Nazi Germany during World War II to administer the occupied zone in areas of northern and western France. This so-called zone occupée was established in June 1940, and renamed zone nord ("north zone") in November 1942, when the previously unoccupied zone in the south known as zone libre ("free zone") was also occupied and renamed zone sud ("south zone"). Its role in France was partly governed by the conditions set by the Armistice of 22 June 1940 after the blitzkrieg success of the Wehrmacht leading to the Fall of France; at the time both French and Germans thought the occupation would be temporary and last only until Britain came to terms, which was believed to be imminent. For instance, France agreed that its soldiers would remain prisoners of war until the cessation of all hostilities. The "French State" (État français) replaced the French Third Republic that had dissolved in defeat. Though nominally extending its sovereignty over the whole country, it was in practice limited in exercising its authority to the free zone. As Paris was located in the occupied zone, its government was seated in the spa town of Vichy in Auvergne, and therefore it was more commonly known as Vichy France. While the Vichy government was nominally in charge of all of France, the military administration in the occupied zone was a de facto Nazi dictatorship, where the actual sovereignty of the French government was seriously limited. Nazi rule was extended to the free zone when it was invaded by Germany and Italy during Case Anton on 11 November 1942 in response to Operation Torch, the Allied landings in French North Africa on 8 November 1942. The Vichy government remained in existence, even though its authority was severely reduced. The German military administration in France ended with the Liberation of France after the Normandy and Provence landings. It formally existed from May 1940 to December 1944, though most of its territory had been liberated by the Allies by the end of summer 1944.
The British Military Administration (BMA) was the interim administrator of British Malaya from August 1945, the end of World War II, to the establishment of the Malayan Union in April 1946. The BMA was under the direct command of the Supreme Allied Commander South East Asia, Lord Louis Mountbatten. The administration had the dual function of maintaining basic subsistence during the period of reoccupation, and also of imposing the state structure upon which post-war imperial power would rest.
The Military Administration in Belgium and Northern France (German: Militärverwaltung in Belgien und Nordfrankreich) was an interim occupation authority established during the Second World War by Nazi Germany that included present-day Belgium and the French departments of Nord and Pas-de-Calais. It remained in existence until July 1944. Plans to transfer Belgium from the military administration to a civilian administration were promoted by the SS, and Hitler had been ready to do so until Autumn 1942, when he put off the plans for what was intended to be temporary but ended up being permanent until the end of German occupation. The SS had suggested either Josef Terboven or Ernst Kaltenbrunner as the Reich Commissioner of the civilian administration.
Before the 1921 destruction of Tulsa’s Greenwood District, Black residents had created a remarkable center of business and community life. The district included stores, professional offices, entertainment venues and homes owned by Black citizens. Understanding Greenwood means learning what was built—not only what was burned.
MORE →Madam C.J. Walker
