q2K BHP
Black History Portal
THE BHP WIRE —
HIDDEN TRUTHS
What's New!
THE JOURNEY THROUGH TIME

Explore Black History

Explore the people, places, events, achievements, struggles and stories that shaped our journey.

✊🏾

Civil Rights

Movements, leaders, victories and the continuing fight for equality.

⚙️

Black Inventors

Innovation, patents, science, technology and world-changing contributions.

🏆

Sports

Pioneers, champions, Negro Leagues, records, activism and excellence.

♟️

People

Meet the people whose lives, choices and achievements shaped the journey.

📍

Places

Black towns, communities, institutions and places where history happened.

📜

Events

Moments that changed communities, movements, institutions and the nation.

Enter a person, place, event, or topic.
MY'STORY

The MOVE Fire

This is a personal recollection on the Move fire on May 13, 1985 Philadelphia police fired thousands of rounds at the MOVE house, city officials approved dropping an explosive device on the roof, the resulting fire was allowed to burn, 11 people—including five children—died, and 61 homes were destroyed. Philadelphia City Council later called it a “brutal attack carried out by the City of Philadelphia on its own citizens” and acknowledged that no individual faced criminal consequences for the bombing. One timeline correction worth preserving for the BHP record: the major previous MOVE-police confrontation was August 8, 1978, about seven years before the bombing, not a year or two earlier. Officer James Ramp was killed, other police and firefighters were wounded, nine MOVE members were later convicted, and television cameras recorded police beating Delbert Africa during his arrest. The 1985 MOVE Commission later specifically criticized city planners for failing to adequately use lessons from that 1978 confrontation. And that actually strengthens the point you’re making: 1985 did not happen without precedent or institutional memory. There had already been a deadly confrontation with MOVE, years of conflict, negotiations and police involvement before Osage Avenue.

MORE →
BLACK FACTS
The Truths They Never Taught You...

Shirley Chisholm — Unbought and Unbossed

In 1968 Shirley Chisholm became the first Black woman elected to the United States Congress. In 1972 she launched a campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination, breaking another political barrier.

MORE →
BHP gathered finds from its connected research sources. Showing the 4 strongest Black History matches.
← BACK TO RESULTS
Wikipedia

Negation introduction

Negation introduction
TypeRule of inference
FieldPropositional calculus
StatementIf a given antecedent implies both the consequent and its complement, then the antecedent is a contradiction.
Symbolic statement

Negation introduction is a rule of inference, or transformation rule, in the field of propositional calculus.

Negation introduction states that if a given antecedent implies both the consequent and its complement, then this implies the negated antecedent.[1][2]

Formal notation

[edit]

This can be written as:

An example of its use would be an attempt to prove two contradictory statements from a single fact. For example, if a person were to state "Whenever I hear the phone ringing I am happy" and then state "Whenever I hear the phone ringing I am not happy", one can infer that the person never hears the phone ringing.

Many proofs by contradiction use negation introduction as reasoning scheme: to prove ¬P, assume for contradiction P, then derive from it two contradictory inferences Q and ¬Q. Since the latter contradiction renders P impossible, ¬P must hold.

Proof

[edit]

With identified as , the principle is as a special case of Frege's theorem, already in minimal logic.

Another derivation makes use of as the curried, equivalent form of . Using this twice, the principle is seen equivalent to the negation of which, via modus ponens and rules for conjunctions, is itself equivalent to the valid noncontradiction principle for .

A classical derivation passing through the introduction of a disjunction may be given as follows:

Step Proposition Derivation
1 Given
2 Classical equivalence of the material implication
3 Distributivity
4 Law of noncontradiction for
5 Disjunctive syllogism (3,4)

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Wansing, Heinrich, ed. (1996). Negation: A Notion in Focus. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. ISBN 3110147696.
  2. ^ Haegeman, Lilliane (30 Mar 1995). The Syntax of Negation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 70. ISBN 0521464927.

Source: Wikipedia. Article content is retrieved live through the MediaWiki API.

No preview image
Wikipedia

Negation introduction

Negation introduction is a rule of inference, or transformation rule, in the field of propositional calculus. Negation introduction states that if a given antecedent implies both the consequent and its complement, then this implies the negated antecedent.

MORE →
Wikipedia

Negation

In logic, negation, also called the logical not or logical complement, is an operation that takes a proposition P {\displaystyle P} to another proposition "not P {\displaystyle P} ", written ¬ P {\displaystyle \neg P} , ∼ P {\displaystyle {\mathord {\sim }}P} , P ′ {\displaystyle P^{\prime }} or P ¯ {\displaystyle {\overline {P}}} . It is interpreted intuitively as being true when P {\displaystyle P} is false, and false when P {\displaystyle P} is true. For example, if P {\displaystyle P} is "The dog runs", then "not P {\displaystyle P} " is "The dog does not run". An operand of a negation is called a negand or negatum. Negation is a unary logical connective. It may furthermore be applied not only to propositions, but also to notions, truth values, or semantic values more generally. In classical logic, negation is normally identified with the truth function that takes truth to falsity (and vice versa). In intuitionistic logic, according to the Brouwer–Heyting–Kolmogorov interpretation, the negation of a proposition P {\displaystyle P} is the proposition whose proofs are the refutations of P {\displaystyle P} .

MORE →
No preview image
Wikipedia

Biconditional introduction

In propositional logic, biconditional introduction is a valid rule of inference. It allows for one to infer a biconditional from two conditional statements. The rule makes it possible to introduce a biconditional statement into a logical proof. If P → Q {\displaystyle P\to Q} is true, and if Q → P {\displaystyle Q\to P} is true, then one may infer that P ↔ Q {\displaystyle P\leftrightarrow Q} is true. For example, from the statements "if I'm breathing, then I'm alive" and "if I'm alive, then I'm breathing", it can be inferred that "I'm breathing if and only if I'm alive". Biconditional introduction is the converse of biconditional elimination. The rule can be stated formally as: P → Q , Q → P ∴ P ↔ Q {\displaystyle {\frac {P\to Q,Q\to P}{\therefore P\leftrightarrow Q}}} where the rule is that wherever instances of " P → Q {\displaystyle P\to Q} " and " Q → P {\displaystyle Q\to P} " appear on lines of a proof, " P ↔ Q {\displaystyle P\leftrightarrow Q} " can validly be placed on a subsequent line.

MORE →
No preview image
Wikipedia

Conjunction introduction

Conjunction introduction (often abbreviated simply as conjunction and also called and introduction or adjunction) is a valid rule of inference of propositional logic. The rule makes it possible to introduce a conjunction into a logical proof. It is the inference that if the proposition P {\displaystyle P} is true, and the proposition Q {\displaystyle Q} is true, then the logical conjunction of the two propositions P {\displaystyle P} and Q {\displaystyle Q} is true. For example, if it is true that "it is raining", and it is true that "the cat is inside", then it is true that "it is raining and the cat is inside". The rule can be stated: P , Q ∴ P ∧ Q {\displaystyle {\frac {P,Q}{\therefore P\land Q}}} where the rule is that wherever an instance of " P {\displaystyle P} " and " Q {\displaystyle Q} " appear on lines of a proof, a " P ∧ Q {\displaystyle P\land Q} " can be placed on a subsequent line.

MORE →
TOPIC OF THE DAY

Greenwood / Black Wall Street

Before the 1921 destruction of Tulsa’s Greenwood District, Black residents had created a remarkable center of business and community life. The district included stores, professional offices, entertainment venues and homes owned by Black citizens. Understanding Greenwood means learning what was built—not only what was burned.

MORE →
TRIVIA QUESTION OF THE DAY

Who was the first African-American woman millionaire in the United States?

Madam C.J. Walker