q2K BHP
Black History Portal
THE BHP WIRE —
HIDDEN TRUTHS
What's New!
THE JOURNEY THROUGH TIME

Explore Black History

Explore the people, places, events, achievements, struggles and stories that shaped our journey.

✊🏾

Civil Rights

Movements, leaders, victories and the continuing fight for equality.

⚙️

Black Inventors

Innovation, patents, science, technology and world-changing contributions.

🏆

Sports

Pioneers, champions, Negro Leagues, records, activism and excellence.

♟️

People

Meet the people whose lives, choices and achievements shaped the journey.

📍

Places

Black towns, communities, institutions and places where history happened.

📜

Events

Moments that changed communities, movements, institutions and the nation.

Enter a person, place, event, or topic.
MY'STORY

The MOVE Fire

This is a personal recollection on the Move fire on May 13, 1985 Philadelphia police fired thousands of rounds at the MOVE house, city officials approved dropping an explosive device on the roof, the resulting fire was allowed to burn, 11 people—including five children—died, and 61 homes were destroyed. Philadelphia City Council later called it a “brutal attack carried out by the City of Philadelphia on its own citizens” and acknowledged that no individual faced criminal consequences for the bombing. One timeline correction worth preserving for the BHP record: the major previous MOVE-police confrontation was August 8, 1978, about seven years before the bombing, not a year or two earlier. Officer James Ramp was killed, other police and firefighters were wounded, nine MOVE members were later convicted, and television cameras recorded police beating Delbert Africa during his arrest. The 1985 MOVE Commission later specifically criticized city planners for failing to adequately use lessons from that 1978 confrontation. And that actually strengthens the point you’re making: 1985 did not happen without precedent or institutional memory. There had already been a deadly confrontation with MOVE, years of conflict, negotiations and police involvement before Osage Avenue.

MORE →
BLACK FACTS
The Truths They Never Taught You...

Wilmington 1898 — An American Coup

Wilmington, North Carolina once had a thriving Black middle class and an elected interracial government. In 1898 white supremacists used violence to overthrow that government, kill Black residents and drive many others from the city.

MORE →
BHP gathered finds from its connected research sources. Showing the 4 strongest Black History matches.
← BACK TO RESULTS
Wikipedia

Phase-locked loop range

The terms hold-in range, pull-in range (acquisition range), and lock-in range are widely used by engineers for the concepts of frequency deviation ranges within which phase-locked loop-based circuits can achieve lock under various additional conditions.

History

[edit]

In the classic books on phase-locked loops,[1][2] published in 1966, such concepts as hold-in, pull-in, lock-in, and other frequency ranges for which PLL can achieve lock, were introduced. They are widely used nowadays (see, e.g. contemporary engineering literature[3][4] and other publications). Usually in engineering literature only non-strict definitions are given for these concepts. Many years of using definitions based on the above concepts has led to the advice given in a handbook on synchronization and communications, namely to check the definitions carefully before using them.[5] Later some rigorous mathematical definitions were given in.[6][7]

Gardner problem on the lock-in range definition

[edit]

In the 1st edition of his well-known work, Phaselock Techniques, Floyd M. Gardner introduced a lock-in concept:[8] If, for some reason, the frequency difference between input and VCO is less than the loop bandwidth, the loop will lock up almost instantaneously without slipping cycles. The maximum frequency difference for which this fast acquisition is possible is called the lock-in frequency. His notion of the lock-in frequency and corresponding definition of the lock-in range have become popular and nowadays are given in various engineering publications. However, since even for zero frequency difference there may exist initial states of loop such that cycle slipping may take place during the acquisition process, the consideration of initial state of the loop is of utmost importance for the cycle slip analysis and, therefore, Gardner’s concept of lock-in frequency lacked rigor and required clarification.

In the 2nd edition of his book, Gardner stated: "there is no natural way to define exactly any unique lock-in frequency", and he wrote that "despite its vague reality, lock-in range is a useful concept".[9][10]

Definitions

[edit]
  • phase difference between input (reference) signal and local oscillator (VCO, NCO) signal.
  • initial phase difference between input signal and VCO signal.
  • frequency difference between input signal frequency and VCO signal.
  • frequency difference between input signal frequency and VCO free running frequency.

Note that in general , because also depends on initial input of VCO.

Locked state

[edit]

Definition of locked state

In a locked state: 1) the phase error fluctuations are small, the frequency error is small; 2) PLL approaches the same locked state after small perturbations of the phases and filter state.

Hold-in range

[edit]
Hold-in range. Free-running frequency of VCO is fixed and input signal frequency is slowly-changing. While ω ref is inside hold-in range, VCO frequency is in tune with it, which is called tracking. Outside hold-in range VCO may unlock from input signal.

Definition of hold-in range.

A largest interval of frequency deviations for which a locked state exists is called a hold-in range, and is called hold-in frequency.[6][7]

Value of frequency deviation belongs to the hold-in range if the loop re-achieves locked state after small perturbations of the filter's state, the phases and frequencies of VCO and the input signals. This effect is also called steady-state stability. In addition, for a frequency deviation within the hold-in range, after a small changes in input frequency loop re-achieves a new locked state (tracking process).

Pull-in range

[edit]

Also called acquisition range, capture range.[11]

Assume that the loop power supply is initially switched off and then at the power is switched on, and assume that the initial frequency difference is sufficiently large. The loop may not lock within one beat note, but the VCO frequency will be slowly tuned toward the reference frequency (acquisition process). This effect is also called a transient stability. The pull-in range is used to name such frequency deviations that make the acquisition process possible (see, for example, explanations in Gardner (1966, p. 40) and Best (2007, p. 61)).

Definition of pull-in range.

Pull-in range is a largest interval of frequency deviations such that PLL acquires lock for arbitrary initial phase, initial frequency, and filter state. Here is called pull-in frequency.[6][7][12]

The difficulties of reliable numerical analysis of the pull-in range may be caused by the presence of hidden attractors in dynamical model of the circuit.[13][14][15]

Lock-in range

[edit]

Assume that PLL is initially locked. Then the reference frequency is suddenly changed in an abrupt manner(step change). Pull-in range guarantees that PLL will eventually synchronize, however this process may take a long time. Such long acquisition process is called cycle slipping.

If difference between initial and final phase deviation is larger than , we say that cycle slipping takes place.

Here, sometimes, the limit of the difference or the maximum of the difference is considered[16]

Definition of lock-in range.

If the loop is in a locked state, then after an abrupt change of free within a lock-in range , the PLL acquires lock without cycle slipping. Here is called lock-in frequency.[6][7][17]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Gardner, Floyd (1966). Phase-lock techniques. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  2. ^ Viterbi, A. (1966). Principles of coherent communications. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  3. ^ Gardner, Floyd (2005). Phase-lock techniques (3rd ed.). Wiley.
  4. ^ Best, Roland (2007). Phase-Lock Loops: Design, Simulation and Application (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  5. ^ Kihara, M.; Ono, S.; Eskelinen, P. (2002). Digital Clocks for Synchronization and Communications. Artech House. p. 49.
  6. ^ a b c d Leonov, G. A.; Kuznetsov, N. V.; Yuldashev, M. V.; Yuldashev, R. V. (2015). "Hold-in, pull-in, and lock-in ranges of PLL circuits: rigorous mathematical definitions and limitations of classical theory". IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers. 62 (10). IEEE: 2454–2464. arXiv:1505.04262. doi:10.1109/TCSI.2015.2476295. S2CID 12292968.
  7. ^ a b c d Kuznetsov, N. V.; Leonov, G. A.; Yuldashev, M. V.; Yuldashev, R. V. (2015). "Rigorous mathematical definitions of the hold-in and pull-in ranges for phase-locked loops". IFAC-PapersOnLine. 48 (11): 710–713. doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.09.272.
  8. ^ Gardner 1966, p. 40
  9. ^ Gardner, Floyd (1979). Phase-lock techniques (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons. p. 70.
  10. ^ see also Gardner 2005, pp. 187–188
  11. ^ Razavi, B. (1996). Design of Monolithic Phase-Locked Loops and Clock Recovery Circuits-A Tutorial. IEEE Press.
  12. ^ Kuznetsov, N.V.; Lobachev, M.Y.; Yuldashev, M.V.; Yuldashev, R.V. (2021). "The Egan problem on the pull-in range of type 2 PLLs". IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs. 68 (4): 1467–1471. doi:10.1109/TCSII.2020.3038075.
  13. ^ Kuznetsov, N.V.; Leonov, G.A.; Yuldashev, M.V.; Yuldashev, R.V. (2017). "Hidden attractors in dynamical models of phase-locked loop circuits: limitations of simulation in MATLAB and SPICE". Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation. 51: 39–49. Bibcode:2017CNSNS..51...39K. doi:10.1016/j.cnsns.2017.03.010.
  14. ^ Best, R.; Kuznetsov, N.V.; Leonov, G.A.; Yuldashev, M.V.; Yuldashev, R.V. (2016). "Tutorial on dynamic analysis of the Costas loop". IFAC Annual Reviews in Control. 42: 27–49. arXiv:1511.04435. doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2016.08.003. S2CID 10703739.
  15. ^ Kuznetsov, N.V.; Lobachev, M.V.; Yuldashev, M.V.; Yuldashev, R.V. (2019). "On the Gardner problem for phase-locked loops". Doklady Mathematics. 100 (3): 568–570. doi:10.1134/S1064562419060218. S2CID 240570100.
  16. ^ Stensby, J. (1997). Phase-Locked Loops: Theory and Applications. Taylor & Francis.
  17. ^ Kuznetsov, N.V.; Lobachev, M.Y.; Yuldashev, M.V.; Yuldashev, R.V.; Tavazoei, M.S. (2023). "The Gardner problem on the lock-in range of second-order type 2 phase-locked loops". IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. 68 (12): 1–15. doi:10.1109/TAC.2023.3277896.

Source: Wikipedia. Article content is retrieved live through the MediaWiki API.

No preview image
Wikipedia

Phase-locked loop range

The terms hold-in range, pull-in range (acquisition range), and lock-in range are widely used by engineers for the concepts of frequency deviation ranges within which phase-locked loop-based circuits can achieve lock under various additional conditions.

MORE →
No preview image
Wikipedia

Frequency-locked loop

A frequency-lock, or frequency-locked loop (FLL), is an electronic control system that generates a signal that is locked to the frequency of an input or "reference" signal. This circuit compares the frequency of a controlled oscillator to the reference, automatically raising or lowering the frequency of the oscillator until its frequency (but not necessarily its phase) is matched to that of the reference. A frequency-locked loop is an example of a control system using negative feedback. Frequency-lock loops are used in radio, telecommunications, computers and other electronic applications to generate stable frequencies, or to recover a signal from a noisy communication channel. A frequency-locked loop is similar to a phase-locked loop (PLL), but only attempts to control the derivative of phase, not the phase itself. Because it tries to do less, an FLL can acquire lock faster and over a wider range than a PLL. Sometimes the two are used in combination, with a frequency-locked loop used initially until the oscillator frequency is close enough to the reference that a PLL can take over. Advanced applications can use both simultaneously, creating what is called an "FLL-assisted PLL" (FPLL).

MORE →
Wikipedia

Voltage-controlled oscillator

A voltage-controlled oscillator (VCO) is an electronic oscillator whose oscillation frequency is controlled by a voltage input. The applied input voltage determines the instantaneous oscillation frequency. Consequently, a VCO can be used for frequency modulation (FM) or phase modulation (PM) by applying a modulating signal to the control input. A VCO is also an integral part of a phase-locked loop. VCOs are used in synthesizers to generate a waveform whose pitch can be adjusted by a voltage determined by a musical keyboard or other input. A voltage-to-frequency converter (VFC) is a VCO that has a very linear transfer function (i.e., the ratio of output frequency to input voltage is nearly constant) over a wide range of input control voltages.

MORE →
No preview image
Wikipedia

Direct-conversion receiver

A direct-conversion receiver (DCR), also known as a homodyne, synchrodyne, zero intermediate frequency receiver (zero-IF receiver), is a radio receiver design that demodulates the incoming radio signal using synchronous detection driven by a local oscillator whose frequency is identical to, or very close to the carrier frequency of the intended signal. This contrasts with the standard superheterodyne receiver, which uses an initial conversion to an intermediate frequency (IF). The simplification of performing only a single frequency conversion reduces the basic circuit complexity but other issues arise, for instance, regarding dynamic range. In its original form it was unsuited to receiving AM and FM signals without implementing an elaborate phase locked loop. Although these and other technical challenges made this technique rather impractical around the time of its invention (1930s), current technology, and software radio in particular, have revived its use in certain areas including some consumer products.

MORE →
TOPIC OF THE DAY

Greenwood / Black Wall Street

Before the 1921 destruction of Tulsa’s Greenwood District, Black residents had created a remarkable center of business and community life. The district included stores, professional offices, entertainment venues and homes owned by Black citizens. Understanding Greenwood means learning what was built—not only what was burned.

MORE →
TRIVIA QUESTION OF THE DAY

Who was the first African-American woman millionaire in the United States?

Madam C.J. Walker