q2K BHP
Black History Portal
THE BHP WIRE —
HIDDEN TRUTHS
What's New!
THE JOURNEY THROUGH TIME

Explore Black History

Explore the people, places, events, achievements, struggles and stories that shaped our journey.

✊🏾

Civil Rights

Movements, leaders, victories and the continuing fight for equality.

⚙️

Black Inventors

Innovation, patents, science, technology and world-changing contributions.

🏆

Sports

Pioneers, champions, Negro Leagues, records, activism and excellence.

♟️

People

Meet the people whose lives, choices and achievements shaped the journey.

📍

Places

Black towns, communities, institutions and places where history happened.

📜

Events

Moments that changed communities, movements, institutions and the nation.

Enter a person, place, event, or topic.
MY'STORY

The MOVE Fire

This is a personal recollection on the Move fire on May 13, 1985 Philadelphia police fired thousands of rounds at the MOVE house, city officials approved dropping an explosive device on the roof, the resulting fire was allowed to burn, 11 people—including five children—died, and 61 homes were destroyed. Philadelphia City Council later called it a “brutal attack carried out by the City of Philadelphia on its own citizens” and acknowledged that no individual faced criminal consequences for the bombing. One timeline correction worth preserving for the BHP record: the major previous MOVE-police confrontation was August 8, 1978, about seven years before the bombing, not a year or two earlier. Officer James Ramp was killed, other police and firefighters were wounded, nine MOVE members were later convicted, and television cameras recorded police beating Delbert Africa during his arrest. The 1985 MOVE Commission later specifically criticized city planners for failing to adequately use lessons from that 1978 confrontation. And that actually strengthens the point you’re making: 1985 did not happen without precedent or institutional memory. There had already been a deadly confrontation with MOVE, years of conflict, negotiations and police involvement before Osage Avenue.

MORE →
BLACK FACTS
The Truths They Never Taught You...

The Violence That Helped Spark the NAACP

In August 1908, a white mob attacked Springfield, Illinois’s Black community, destroying homes and businesses and lynching two Black men. National outrage over the violence helped spur the movement that created the NAACP the following year.

MORE →
BHP gathered finds from its connected research sources. Showing the 4 strongest Black History matches.
← BACK TO RESULTS
Wikipedia

Wiwa v. Royal Dutch Shell Co.

Protest in Washington, D.C. against the killing of Saro-Wiwa and others, November 1995

The Wiwa family lawsuits against Royal Dutch Shell were three separate lawsuits brought in 1996 by the family of Ken Saro-Wiwa against Royal Dutch Shell, its subsidiary Shell Nigeria and the subsidiary's CEO Brian Anderson. Charges included human rights abuses against the Ogoni people in the Niger Delta, summary execution, torture, arbitrary arrest, and wrongful death. After 12 years of Shell petitioning the court not to hear the cases,[1] they were heard May 26, 2009.[2]

On June 8, 2009, Shell settled out-of-court with the Saro-Wiwa family for $15.5 million.[2][3]

Background

[edit]

The particular incidents raised in these cases were:

American photojournalist Ed Kashi's images from the book Curse of the Black Gold: 50 Years of Oil in the Niger Delta[4] were deposed as evidence of the human rights abuses that the oil industry, particularly Shell, has inflicted on the Ogoni people.[citation needed]

Case

[edit]

The lawsuit was filed in 1996 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, and charges were made under the Alien Tort Statute, the Torture Victim Protection Act of 1992 and Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO).[5] Plaintiffs were charged with complicity in human rights abuses against the Ogoni people in the Niger Delta, including summary execution, crimes against humanity, torture, inhumane treatment, arbitrary arrest, wrongful death, and assault and battery. The lawsuits were filed by the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) and co-counsel from EarthRights International.

Resolution

[edit]

On June 8, 2009, Shell settled out-of-court with the Saro-Wiwa family for $15.5 million.[2][3] Ben Amunwa, director of the Remember Saro-Wiwa organization, said that "No company, that is innocent of any involvement with the Nigeria military and human rights abuses, would settle out of court for 15.5 million dollars. It clearly shows that they have something to hide".[6]

Shell stated the payment was a humanitarian gesture and a gesture of sympathy, denying culpability in the death of Ken Saro-Wiwa and the deaths of the Ogoni Nine.[7]

Impact on environmental justice and corporate accountability

[edit]

The case brought international attention to environmental destruction in the Niger Delta, increasing pressure on oil companies to adopt stricter environmental policies and community engagement practices.[8] It highlighted the role of multinational corporations in environmental degradation and human rights violations, reinforcing calls for stronger regulations on corporate activities in resource-rich but politically unstable regions.[9][10] The lawsuit set a legal precedent for holding corporations accountable for their actions abroad. Because the plaintiffs in this case demonstrated that companies could be sued for human rights abuses in foreign jurisdiction, this encouraged other affected communities to pursue legal action. A few months after the verdict, the UK Supreme Court agreed to consider additional cases from the Ogale and Bille communities against Royal Dutch Shell and SPDC over widespread environmental pollution in the Niger Delta.[11] There has also been an enhanced focus on human rights in U.S. courts, as the ruling made it easier to bring claims based on a foreign human rights violation despite alternative forums being available.[12]

Ongoing environmental damage and disputed cleanup efforts

[edit]

Despite the settlement, environmental degradation remains severe, and there is widespread contamination in water sources and soil, with some areas requiring decades-long remediation efforts.[13] After a 2011 United Nations Environmental Programme report documented severe contamination, Shell claimed it had addressed the identified pollution. However, recent studies contradict Shell's claims, and there are sites that are visibly contaminated with the remnants of past oil spills.[14]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "New York trial delayed for Nigerians suing Shell". Shell International B.V. April 6, 2009.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link)
  2. ^ a b c Mouawad, Jad (June 8, 2009). "Shell to Pay $15.5 Million to Settle Nigerian Case". New York Times. Retrieved June 9, 2009.
  3. ^ a b "Saro-Wiwa's son: Justice is always hard won". CNN.com. June 9, 2009. Retrieved June 9, 2009.
  4. ^ Tregaskis, Shiona (March 10, 2010). "Curse of the Black Gold. Selection of titled photos by Ed Kashi at an exhibition at HOST gallery". The Guardian. Retrieved October 5, 2012.
  5. ^ "Wiwa et al v. Royal Dutch Petroleum et al". Center for Constitutional Rights. Retrieved February 13, 2025.
  6. ^ Did Shell collaborate in Nigerian executions? Channel 4 report hosted at The Real News. June 10, 2009
  7. ^ "Shell settles Wiwa case with humanitarian gesture". Shell.com. June 8, 2009. Archived from the original on November 3, 2012. Retrieved October 5, 2012.
  8. ^ "The price of oil: the impact of oil pollution on Niger Delta communities". Amnesty International. November 3, 2015. Retrieved February 13, 2025.
  9. ^ "Wiwa et al v. Royal Dutch Petroleum et al". Center for Constitutional Rights. Retrieved February 13, 2025.
  10. ^ Yusuf, Hakeem O.; Omoteso, Kamil (November 1, 2016). "Combating environmental irresponsibility of transnational corporations in Africa: an empirical analysis". Local Environment. 21 (11): 1372–1386. doi:10.1080/13549839.2015.1119812. ISSN 1354-9839.
  11. ^ Chang, Alvin; Liu, Rita; Craig, Jess (June 1, 2022). "'We were eating, drinking, breathing the oil': the villagers who stood up to big oil – and won". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved February 13, 2025.
  12. ^ Fellmeth, Aaron Xavier (2002). "Wiwa v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.: A New Standard for the Enforcement of International Law in U.S. Courts?" (PDF). Yale Human Rights & Development Law Journal. 5.
  13. ^ "The price of oil: the impact of oil pollution on Niger Delta communities". Amnesty International. November 3, 2015. Retrieved February 13, 2025.
  14. ^ "Remembering Ken Saro-Wiwa: The Struggle Continues in the Niger Delta". International Human Rights Clinic. November 10, 2015. Retrieved February 13, 2025.
[edit]

Source: Wikipedia. Article content is retrieved live through the MediaWiki API.

Wikipedia

Wiwa v. Royal Dutch Shell Co.

The Wiwa family lawsuits against Royal Dutch Shell were three separate lawsuits brought in 1996 by the family of Ken Saro-Wiwa against Royal Dutch Shell, its subsidiary Shell Nigeria and the subsidiary's CEO Brian Anderson. Charges included human rights abuses against the Ogoni people in the Niger Delta, summary execution, torture, arbitrary arrest, and wrongful death. After 12 years of Shell petitioning the court not to hear the cases, they were heard May 26, 2009. On June 8, 2009, Shell settled out-of-court with the Saro-Wiwa family for $15.5 million.

MORE →
Wikipedia

Milieudefensie v Royal Dutch Shell

Milieudefensie v Royal Dutch Shell (2021) is a human rights law and tort law case heard by the district court of The Hague in the Netherlands in 2021 related to efforts by several NGO's to curtail carbon dioxide emissions by multinational corporations. It was brought by the Dutch branch of Friends of the Earth and a group of other NGO's against the oil corporation, Shell plc. In May 2021, the court ordered Shell to reduce its global carbon emissions from its 2019 levels by 45% by 2030, relating not only to the emissions from its operations, but also those from the products it sells. However, on 12 November 2024, The Hague's appeals court dismissed the 2021 ruling that had required Shell to cut its emissions, determining that there was no "societal standard of care" to enforce specific emissions reductions on Shell.

MORE →
Wikipedia

Showa Shell Sekiyu

Showa Shell Sekiyu K.K. (昭和シェル石油株式会社, Shōwa Sheru Sekiyu kabushiki gaisha) was a Japanese company that operated as a subsidiary of Royal Dutch Shell until it was acquired by Idemitsu Kosan in 2018 and integrated into the company the following year. It was formed by the merger of Showa Oil Company and Shell Sekiyu which was begun around 1876 in Yokohama by Samuel Samuel & Co, the predecessor of Shell Group today. Showa Shell Sekiyu acted as an oil and energy products business in Japan and worldwide, from crude oil extraction and refining, to retail and wholesale energy supply operations.

MORE →
Wikipedia

Shell Aircraft

Shell Aircraft International, based at Rotterdam The Hague Airport, operates executive business jet aircraft for Shell plc headquarters, and for one Shell Group operating company, Shell Oil Company in the United States. It also provides advice on air operations and flight standards to Shell Group companies. Of historical note, Sir Douglas Bader, Second World War fighter pilot of the Royal Air Force (RAF) and double-leg amputee was aviation director in the United Kingdom for Royal Dutch Shell. Prior to 2000, Shell Aircraft Limited operated corporate jets for Shell Group headquarters, and Shell Oil and Shell Canada operated their aircraft independently. In 2000, the three operations were linked in Shell Aircraft International, whose first CEO was Brian Humphries. On 4 October 2013, the operation of Shell Canada Aviation based in Calgary was closed down after 60 years operation, and future operations were contracted out to Flair Airlines Ltd. The ICAO telephony designator (call sign) changed from SHELL to PECTEN in the Edition 201 of the ICAO DOC 8585 Edition 201, published July 2022, however the three-letter designator remained SHE.

MORE →
TOPIC OF THE DAY

Greenwood / Black Wall Street

Before the 1921 destruction of Tulsa’s Greenwood District, Black residents had created a remarkable center of business and community life. The district included stores, professional offices, entertainment venues and homes owned by Black citizens. Understanding Greenwood means learning what was built—not only what was burned.

MORE →
TRIVIA QUESTION OF THE DAY

What prosperous Tulsa district became widely known as “Black Wall Street”?

The Greenwood District.