q2K BHP
Black History Portal
THE BHP WIRE —
HIDDEN TRUTHS
What's New!
THE JOURNEY THROUGH TIME

Explore Black History

Explore the people, places, events, achievements, struggles and stories that shaped our journey.

✊🏾

Civil Rights

Movements, leaders, victories and the continuing fight for equality.

⚙️

Black Inventors

Innovation, patents, science, technology and world-changing contributions.

🏆

Sports

Pioneers, champions, Negro Leagues, records, activism and excellence.

♟️

People

Meet the people whose lives, choices and achievements shaped the journey.

📍

Places

Black towns, communities, institutions and places where history happened.

📜

Events

Moments that changed communities, movements, institutions and the nation.

Enter a person, place, event, or topic.
MY'STORY

The MOVE Fire

This is a personal recollection on the Move fire on May 13, 1985 Philadelphia police fired thousands of rounds at the MOVE house, city officials approved dropping an explosive device on the roof, the resulting fire was allowed to burn, 11 people—including five children—died, and 61 homes were destroyed. Philadelphia City Council later called it a “brutal attack carried out by the City of Philadelphia on its own citizens” and acknowledged that no individual faced criminal consequences for the bombing. One timeline correction worth preserving for the BHP record: the major previous MOVE-police confrontation was August 8, 1978, about seven years before the bombing, not a year or two earlier. Officer James Ramp was killed, other police and firefighters were wounded, nine MOVE members were later convicted, and television cameras recorded police beating Delbert Africa during his arrest. The 1985 MOVE Commission later specifically criticized city planners for failing to adequately use lessons from that 1978 confrontation. And that actually strengthens the point you’re making: 1985 did not happen without precedent or institutional memory. There had already been a deadly confrontation with MOVE, years of conflict, negotiations and police involvement before Osage Avenue.

MORE →
BLACK FACTS
The Truths They Never Taught You...

Wilmington 1898 — An American Coup

Wilmington, North Carolina once had a thriving Black middle class and an elected interracial government. In 1898 white supremacists used violence to overthrow that government, kill Black residents and drive many others from the city.

MORE →
BHP gathered finds from its connected research sources. Showing the 4 strongest Black History matches.
← BACK TO RESULTS
Wikipedia

SMAD4

SMAD4
Identifiers
AliasesSMAD4, DPC4, JIP, MADH4, MYHRS, SMAD family member 4
External IDsOMIM: 600993; MGI: 894293; GeneCards: SMAD4
Available structures
PDBOrtholog search: PDBe RCSB
Orthologs
DatabasesNCBI: entry; OMA: entry
SpeciesHumanMouse
Entrez
Ensembl
UniProt
RefSeq (mRNA)

NM_005359

NM_008540
NM_001364967
NM_001364968

RefSeq (protein)

NP_005350

NP_032566
NP_001351896
NP_001351897

Location (UCSC)Chr 18: 51.03 – 51.09 MbChr 18: 73.77 – 73.84 Mb
PubMed search[3][4]
Wikidata
View/Edit HumanView/Edit Mouse

SMAD4, also called SMAD family member 4, Mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 4, or DPC4 (deleted in pancreatic cancer 4) is a highly conserved protein present in all metazoans. It belongs to the SMAD family of transcription factor proteins, which act as mediators of TGF-β signal transduction. The TGFβ family of cytokines regulates critical processes during the lifecycle of metazoans, with important roles during embryo development, tissue homeostasis, regeneration, and immune regulation.[5]

SMAD 4 belongs to the co-SMAD group (common mediator SMAD), the second class of the SMAD family. SMAD4 is the only known co-SMAD in most metazoans. It also belongs to the Dwarfin family of proteins that modulate members of the TGFβ protein superfamily, a family of proteins that all play a role in the regulation of cellular responses. Mammalian SMAD4 is a homolog of the Drosophila protein "Mothers against decapentaplegic" named Medea.[6]

SMAD4 interacts with R-Smads, such as SMAD2, SMAD3, SMAD1, SMAD5 and SMAD9 (also called SMAD8) to form heterotrimeric complexes. Transcriptional coregulators, such as WWTR1 (TAZ) interact with SMADs to promote their function. Once in the nucleus, the complex of SMAD4 and two R-SMADS binds to DNA and regulates the expression of different genes depending on the cellular context.[6] Intracellular reactions involving SMAD4 are triggered by the binding, on the surface of the cells, of growth factors from the TGFβ family. The sequence of intracellular reactions involving SMADS is called the SMAD pathway or the transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) pathway since the sequence starts with the recognition of TGF-β by cells.

Gene

[edit]

In humans, the SMAD4 gene contains 54 829 base pairs and is located from pair n° 51,030,212 to pair 51,085,041 in the region 21.1 of the chromosome 18.[7][8]

Pattern of the chromosome 18 in Homo sapiens. The SMAD 4 gene is located on the long arm of the chromosome, at locus 21.1. This locus corresponds to the black stripe between the regions 12.3 and 21.2.

Protein

[edit]

SMAD4 is a 552 amino-acid polypeptide with a molecular weight of 60.439 Da. SMAD4 has two functional domains known as MH1 and MH2.

SMAD 4 is composed of three major domains, including MH1 (up), MH2 (down) and a linking domain (right).

The complex of two SMAD3 (or of two SMAD2) and one SMAD4 binds directly to DNA though interactions of their MH1 domains. These complexes are recruited to sites throughout the genome by cell lineage-defining transcription factors (LDTFs) that determine the context-dependent nature of TGF-β action. Early insights into the DNA binding specificity of Smad proteins came from oligonucleotide binding screens, which identified the palindromic duplex 5'–GTCTAGAC–3' as a high affinity binding sequence for SMAD3 and SMAD4 MH1 domains.[9] Other motifs have also been identified in promoters and enhancers. These additional sites contain the CAGCC motif and the GGC(GC)|(CG) consensus sequences, the latter also known as 5GC sites.[10] The 5GC-motifs are highly represented as clusters of sites, in SMAD-bound regions genome-wide. These clusters can also contain CAG(AC)|(CC) sites. SMAD3/SMAD4 complex also binds to the TPA-responsive gene promoter elements, which have the sequence motif TGAGTCAG.[11]

Structures

[edit]

MH1 domain complexes with DNA motifs

[edit]

The first structure of SMAD4 bound to DNA was the complex with the palindromic GTCTAGAC motif.[12] Recently, the structures of SMAD4 MH1 domain bound to several 5GC motifs have also been determined. In all complexes, the interaction with the DNA involves a conserved β-hairpin present in the MH1 domain. The hairpin is partially flexible in solution and its high degree of conformational flexibility allows recognition of the different 5-bp sequences. Efficient interactions with GC-sites occur only if a G nucleotide is located deep in the major grove, and establishes hydrogen bonds with the guanidinium group of Arg81. This interaction facilitates a complementary surface contact between the Smad DNA-binding hairpin and the major groove of the DNA. Other direct interactions involve Lys88 and Gln83. The X-ray crystal structure of the Trichoplax adhaerens SMAD4 MH1 domains bound to the GGCGC motif indicates a high conservation of this interaction in metazoans.[10]

Smad4 MH1 domain bound to the GGCT DNA motif, from PDB: 5MEZ​
Close-up view of the Smad4 MH1 domain bound to the GGCGC DNA motif, from PDB: 5MEY​
Smad4 MH1 domain bound to the GGCGC DNA motif, from PDB: 5MEY​

MH2 domain complexes

[edit]

The MH2 domain, corresponding to the C-terminus, is responsible for receptor recognition and association with other SMADs. It interacts with the R-SMADS MH2 domain and forms heterodimers and heterotrimers. Some tumor mutations detected in SMAD4 enhance interactions between the MH1 and MH2 domains.[13]

Nomenclature and origin of name

[edit]

SMADs are highly conserved across species, especially in the N terminal MH1 domain and the C terminal MH2 domain. The SMAD proteins are homologs of both the Drosophila protein MAD and the C. elegans protein SMA. The name is a combination of the two. During Drosophila research, it was found that a mutation in the gene MAD in the mother repressed the gene decapentaplegic in the embryo. The phrase "Mothers against" was added, since mothers often form organizations opposing various issues, e.g. Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD), reflecting "the maternal-effect enhancement of dpp";[14] and based on a tradition of unusual naming within the research community.[15] SMAD4 is also known as DPC4, JIP or MADH4.

Function and action mechanism

[edit]

SMAD4 is a protein defined as an essential effector in the SMAD pathway. SMAD4 serves as a mediator between extracellular growth factors from the TGFβ family and genes inside the cell nucleus. The abbreviation co in co-SMAD stands for common mediator. SMAD4 is also defined as a signal transducer.

In the TGF-β pathway, TGF-β dimers are recognized by a transmembrane receptor, known as type II receptor. Once the type II receptor is activated by the binding of TGF-β, it phosphorylates a type I receptor. Type I receptor is also a cell surface receptor. This receptor then phosphorylates intracellular receptor regulated SMADS (R-SMADS) such as SMAD2 or SMAD3. The phosphorylated R-SMADS then bind to SMAD4. The R-SMADs-SMAD4 association is a heteromeric complex. This complex is going to move from the cytoplasm to the nucleus: it is the translocation. SMAD4 may form heterotrimeric, heterohexameric or heterodimeric complexes with R-SMADS.

SMAD4 is a substrate of the Erk/MAPK kinase[16] and GSK3.[17] The FGF (Fibroblast Growth Factor) pathway stimulation leads to Smad4 phosphorylation by Erk of the canonical MAPK site located at Threonine 277. This phosphorylation event has a dual effect on Smad4 activity. First, it allows Smad4 to reach its peak of transcriptional activity by activating a growth factor–regulated transcription activation domain located in the Smad4 linker region, SAD (Smad-Activation Domain).[18] Second, MAPK primes Smad4 for GSK3-mediated phosphorylations that cause transcriptional inhibition and also generate a phosphodegron used as a docking site by the ubiquitin E3 ligase Beta-transducin Repeat Containing (beta-TrCP) that polyubiquitinates Smad4 and targets it for degradation in the proteasome.[19] Smad4 GSK3 phosphorylations have been proposed to regulate the protein stability during pancreatic and colon cancer progression.[20]

In the nucleus the heteromeric complex binds promoters and interact with transcriptional activators. SMAD3/SMAD4 complexes can directly bind the SBE. These associations are weak and require additional transcription factors such as members of the AP-1 family, TFE3 and FoxG1 to regulate gene expression.[21]

Many TGFβ ligands use this pathway and subsequently SMAD4 is involved in many cell functions such as differentiation, apoptosis, gastrulation, embryonic development and the cell cycle.

Clinical significance

[edit]

Genetic experiments such as gene knockout (KO), which consist in modifying or inactivating a gene, can be carried out in order to see the effects of a dysfunctional SMAD 4 on the study organism. Experiments are often conducted in the house mouse (Mus musculus).

It has been shown that, in mouse KO of SMAD4, the granulosa cells, which secrete hormones and growth factors during the oocyte development, undergo premature luteinization and express lower levels of follicle-stimulating hormone receptors (FSHR) and higher levels of luteinizing hormone receptors (LHR). This may be due in part to impairment of bone morphogenetic protein-7 effects as BMP-7 uses the SMAD4 signaling pathway.[22][23]

Deletions in the genes coding for SMAD1 and SMAD5 have also been linked to metastasic granulosa cell tumors in mice.[24]

SMAD4, is often found mutated in many cancers. The mutation can be inherited or acquired during an individual's lifetime. If inherited, the mutation affects both somatic cells and cells of the reproductive organs. If the SMAD 4 mutation is acquired, it will only exist in certain somatic cells. Indeed, SMAD 4 is not synthesized by all cells. The protein is present in skin, pancreatic, colon, uterus and epithelial cells. It is also produced by fibroblasts. The functional SMAD 4 participates in the regulation of the TGF-β signal transduction pathway, which negatively regulates growth of epithelial cells and the extracellular matrix (ECM). When the structure of SMAD 4 is altered, expression of the genes involved in cell growth is no longer regulated and cell proliferation can go on without any inhibition. The important number of cell divisions leads to the forming of tumors and then to multiploid colorectal cancer and pancreatic carcinoma. It is found inactivated in at least 50% of pancreatic cancers.[25]

Somatic mutations found in human cancers of the MH1 domain of SMAD 4 have been shown to inhibit the DNA-binding function of this domain.

SMAD 4 is also found mutated in the autosomal dominant disease juvenile polyposis syndrome (JPS). JPS is characterized by hamartomatous polyps in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. These polyps are usually benign, however they are at greater risk of developing gastrointestinal cancers, in particular colon cancer. Around 60 mutations causing JPS have been identified. They have been linked to the production of a smaller SMAD 4, with missing domains that prevent the protein from binding to R-SMADS and forming heteromeric complexes.[8]

Mutations in SMAD4 (mostly substitutions) can cause Myhre syndrome, a rare inherited disorder characterized by mental disabilities, short stature, unusual facial features, and various bone abnormalities.[26][27]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c GRCh38: Ensembl release 89: ENSG00000141646 – Ensembl, May 2017
  2. ^ a b c GRCm38: Ensembl release 89: ENSMUSG00000024515 – Ensembl, May 2017
  3. ^ "Human PubMed Reference:". National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine.
  4. ^ "Mouse PubMed Reference:". National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine.
  5. ^ Massagué J (October 2012). "TGFβ signalling in context". Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology. 13 (10): 616–630. doi:10.1038/nrm3434. PMC 4027049. PMID 22992590.
  6. ^ a b Massagué J (1998). "TGF-beta signal transduction". Annual Review of Biochemistry. 67 (1): 753–791. doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.67.1.753. PMID 9759503.
  7. ^ "SMAD4 SMAD family member 4". Entrez Gene.
  8. ^ a b "SMAD 4". The Genetics Home Reference Website.
  9. ^ Zawel L, Dai JL, Buckhaults P, Zhou S, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, et al. (March 1998). "Human Smad3 and Smad4 are sequence-specific transcription activators". Molecular Cell. 1 (4): 611–617. doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80061-1. PMID 9660945.
  10. ^ a b Martin-Malpartida P, Batet M, Kaczmarska Z, Freier R, Gomes T, Aragón E, et al. (December 2017). "Structural basis for genome wide recognition of 5-bp GC motifs by SMAD transcription factors". Nature Communications. 8 (1) 2070. Bibcode:2017NatCo...8.2070M. doi:10.1038/s41467-017-02054-6. PMC 5727232. PMID 29234012.
  11. ^ Zhang Y, Feng XH, Derynck R (August 1998). "Smad3 and Smad4 cooperate with c-Jun/c-Fos to mediate TGF-beta-induced transcription". Nature. 394 (6696): 909–913. Bibcode:1998Natur.394..909Z. doi:10.1038/29814. PMID 9732876. S2CID 4393852.
  12. ^ Baburajendran N, Jauch R, Tan CY, Narasimhan K, Kolatkar PR (October 2011). "Structural basis for the cooperative DNA recognition by Smad4 MH1 dimers". Nucleic Acids Research. 39 (18): 8213–8222. doi:10.1093/nar/gkr500. PMC 3185416. PMID 21724602.
  13. ^ Hata A, Lo RS, Wotton D, Lagna G, Massagué J (July 1997). "Mutations increasing autoinhibition inactivate tumour suppressors Smad2 and Smad4". Nature. 388 (6637): 82–87. Bibcode:1997Natur.388R..82H. doi:10.1038/40424. PMID 9214507. S2CID 4407819.
  14. ^ Sekelsky JJ, Newfeld SJ, Raftery LA, Chartoff EH, Gelbart WM (March 1995). "Genetic characterization and cloning of mothers against dpp, a gene required for decapentaplegic function in Drosophila melanogaster". Genetics. 139 (3): 1347–1358. doi:10.1093/genetics/139.3.1347. PMC 1206461. PMID 7768443.
  15. ^ White M (26 September 2014). "Sonic Hedgehog, DICER, and the Problem With Naming Genes". Pacific Standard.
  16. ^ Roelen BA, Cohen OS, Raychowdhury MK, Chadee DN, Zhang Y, Kyriakis JM, et al. (October 2003). "Phosphorylation of threonine 276 in Smad4 is involved in transforming growth factor-beta-induced nuclear accumulation". American Journal of Physiology. Cell Physiology. 285 (4): C823–C830. doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00053.2003. PMID 12801888. S2CID 9326115.
  17. ^ Demagny H, Araki T, De Robertis EM (October 2014). "The tumor suppressor Smad4/DPC4 is regulated by phosphorylations that integrate FGF, Wnt, and TGF-β signaling". Cell Reports. 9 (2): 688–700. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2014.09.020. PMID 25373906.
  18. ^ de Caestecker MP, Yahata T, Wang D, Parks WT, Huang S, Hill CS, et al. (January 2000). "The Smad4 activation domain (SAD) is a proline-rich, p300-dependent transcriptional activation domain". The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 275 (3): 2115–2122. doi:10.1074/jbc.275.3.2115. PMID 10636916.
  19. ^ Demagny H, De Robertis EM (March 2016). "Smad4/DPC4: A barrier against tumor progression driven by RTK/Ras/Erk and Wnt/GSK3 signaling". Molecular & Cellular Oncology. 3 (2) e989133. doi:10.4161/23723556.2014.989133. PMC 4905428. PMID 27308623.
  20. ^ Demagny H, De Robertis EM (January 2016). "Point mutations in the tumor suppressor Smad4/DPC4 enhance its phosphorylation by GSK3 and reversibly inactivate TGF-β signaling". Molecular & Cellular Oncology. 3 (1) e1025181. doi:10.1080/23723556.2015.1025181. PMC 4845174. PMID 27308538.
  21. ^ Inman GJ (February 2005). "Linking Smads and transcriptional activation". The Biochemical Journal. 386 (Pt 1) E1: e1–e3. doi:10.1042/bj20042133. PMC 1134782. PMID 15702493.
  22. ^ Shi J, Yoshino O, Osuga Y, Nishii O, Yano T, Taketani Y (March 2010). "Bone morphogenetic protein 7 (BMP-7) increases the expression of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) receptor in human granulosa cells". Fertility and Sterility. 93 (4): 1273–1279. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.11.014. PMID 19108831.
  23. ^ Pangas SA, Li X, Robertson EJ, Matzuk MM (June 2006). "Premature luteinization and cumulus cell defects in ovarian-specific Smad4 knockout mice". Molecular Endocrinology. 20 (6): 1406–1422. doi:10.1210/me.2005-0462. PMID 16513794.
  24. ^ Middlebrook BS, Eldin K, Li X, Shivasankaran S, Pangas SA (December 2009). "Smad1-Smad5 ovarian conditional knockout mice develop a disease profile similar to the juvenile form of human granulosa cell tumors". Endocrinology. 150 (12): 5208–5217. doi:10.1210/en.2009-0644. PMC 2819741. PMID 19819941.
  25. ^ Cotran RS, Kumar V, Fausto N, Robbins SL, Abbas AK (2005). Robbins and Cotran pathologic basis of disease (7th ed.). St. Louis, Mo: Elsevier Saunders. ISBN 0-7216-0187-1.
  26. ^ "Growth-Mental Deficiency Syndrome of Myhre". National Organization for rare disorders. Archived from the original on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 26 March 2015.
  27. ^ Caputo V, Bocchinfuso G, Castori M, Traversa A, Pizzuti A, Stella L, et al. (July 2014). "Novel SMAD4 mutation causing Myhre syndrome". American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A. 164A (7): 1835–1840. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.36544. PMID 24715504. S2CID 5294309.

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]

Source: Wikipedia. Article content is retrieved live through the MediaWiki API.

Wikipedia

SMAD4

SMAD4, also called SMAD family member 4, Mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 4, or DPC4 (deleted in pancreatic cancer 4) is a highly conserved protein present in all metazoans. It belongs to the SMAD family of transcription factor proteins, which act as mediators of TGF-β signal transduction. The TGFβ family of cytokines regulates critical processes during the lifecycle of metazoans, with important roles during embryo development, tissue homeostasis, regeneration, and immune regulation. SMAD 4 belongs to the co-SMAD group (common mediator SMAD), the second class of the SMAD family. SMAD4 is the only known co-SMAD in most metazoans. It also belongs to the Dwarfin family of proteins that modulate members of the TGFβ protein superfamily, a family of proteins that all play a role in the regulation of cellular responses. Mammalian SMAD4 is a homolog of the Drosophila protein "Mothers against decapentaplegic" named Medea. SMAD4 interacts with R-Smads, such as SMAD2, SMAD3, SMAD1, SMAD5 and SMAD9 (also called SMAD8) to form heterotrimeric complexes. Transcriptional coregulators, such as WWTR1 (TAZ) interact with SMADs to promote their function. Once in the nucleus, the complex of SMAD4 and two R-SMADS binds to DNA and regulates the expression of different genes depending on the cellular context. Intracellular reactions involving SMAD4 are triggered by the binding, on the surface of the cells, of growth factors from the TGFβ family. The sequence of intracellular reactions involving SMADS is called the SMAD pathway or the transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) pathway since the sequence starts with the recognition of TGF-β by cells.

MORE →
Wikipedia

SMAD6

SMAD family member 6, also known as SMAD6, is a protein that in humans is encoded by the SMAD6 gene. SMAD6 is a protein that, as its name describes, is a homolog of the Drosophila gene "mothers against decapentaplegic". It belongs to the SMAD family of proteins, which belong to the TGFβ superfamily of modulators. Like many other TGFβ family members SMAD6 is involved in cell signalling. It acts as a regulator of TGFβ family (such as bone morphogenetic proteins) activity by competing with SMAD4 and preventing the transcription of SMAD4's gene products. There are two known isoforms of this protein.

MORE →
Wikipedia

DACH1

Dachshund homolog 1, also known as DACH1, is a protein which in humans is encoded by the DACH1 gene. DACH1 has been shown to interact with Ubc9, Smad4, and NCoR.

MORE →
Wikipedia

Myhre syndrome

Myhre syndrome (MS) is an ultrarare genetic disorder caused by dominant gain-of-function (GOF) mutations in the SMAD4 gene. MS mutations are missense heterozygous mutations affecting only Ile500 or Arg496 residues of the SMAD4 protein. MS patients exhibit manifestations of connective tissue disease including dysfunction of the integumentary, cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, and musculoskeletal systems and is often characterized by proliferative systemic fibrosis. Some of these features are life threatening, such as airway or arterial narrowing (laryngotracheal stenosis or aortic coarctation) and fibroproliferation of tissues including lung, heart, and liver. Consistent with these clinical observations, cells isolated from patients with MS demonstrate increased TGF-β signaling. In contrast, loss-of-function (LOF) mutations in SMAD4 predispose individuals to gastrointestinal polyps, a higher risk of colorectal cancer, and a risk of forming arteriovenous malformations (AVM) a hallmark manifestation of hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT). Patients also have external phenotypes similar to Marfan syndrome. Biologically, SMAD4 plays a prominent role in both canonical TGF-β and other TGF-β superfamily signaling. The systemic manifestations of these two disorders suggest opposite biologic effects, such as the finding of aortic aneurysm in SMAD4-JP-HHT (LOF of SMAD4) versus the aortic hypoplasia seen in Myhre syndrome (GOF in SMAD4).

MORE →
TOPIC OF THE DAY

Greenwood / Black Wall Street

Before the 1921 destruction of Tulsa’s Greenwood District, Black residents had created a remarkable center of business and community life. The district included stores, professional offices, entertainment venues and homes owned by Black citizens. Understanding Greenwood means learning what was built—not only what was burned.

MORE →
TRIVIA QUESTION OF THE DAY

Which Supreme Court case ruled state-sponsored public-school segregation unconstitutional?

Brown v. Board of Education in 1954.