Civil Rights
Movements, leaders, victories and the continuing fight for equality.
Explore the people, places, events, achievements, struggles and stories that shaped our journey.
Movements, leaders, victories and the continuing fight for equality.
Innovation, patents, science, technology and world-changing contributions.
Pioneers, champions, Negro Leagues, records, activism and excellence.
Meet the people whose lives, choices and achievements shaped the journey.
Black towns, communities, institutions and places where history happened.
Moments that changed communities, movements, institutions and the nation.
Katherine Johnson’s mathematical calculations helped guide some of America’s most important early space missions while she confronted the racial and gender barriers faced by Black women in twentieth-century America.
MORE →Reflects the personal views, recollections, and perspective of the author, Mike Davis.
This is a personal recollection on the Move fire on May 13, 1985


Miller indices form a notation system in crystallography for lattice planes in crystal (Bravais) lattices.
In particular, a family of lattice planes of a given (direct) Bravais lattice is determined by three integers h, k, and l, the Miller indices. They are written (hkl), and denote the family of (parallel) lattice planes (of the given Bravais lattice) orthogonal to where bi are the basis or primitive translation vectors of the reciprocal lattice for the given Bravais lattice. (Note that the plane is not always orthogonal to the linear combination of direct or original lattice vectors because the direct lattice vectors need not be mutually orthogonal.) This is based on the fact that a reciprocal lattice vector g (the vector indicating a reciprocal lattice point from the reciprocal lattice origin) is the wavevector of a plane wave in the Fourier series of a spatial function (e.g., electronic density function) which periodicity follows the original Bravais lattice, so wavefronts of the plane wave are coincident with parallel lattice planes of the original lattice. Since a measured scattering vector in X-ray crystallography, with kout as the outgoing (scattered from a crystal lattice) X-ray wavevector and kin as the incoming (toward the crystal lattice) X-ray wavevector, is equal to a reciprocal lattice vector g as stated by the Laue equations, the measured scattered X-ray peak at each measured scattering vector Δk is marked by Miller indices.
By convention, negative integers are written with a bar, as in 3 for −3. The integers are usually written in lowest terms, i.e. their greatest common divisor should be 1. Miller indices are also used to designate reflections in X-ray crystallography. In this case the integers are not necessarily in lowest terms, and can be thought of as corresponding to planes spaced such that the reflections from adjacent planes would have a phase difference of exactly one wavelength (2π), regardless of whether there are atoms on all these planes or not.
There are also several related notations:[1]
In the context of crystal directions (not planes), the corresponding notations are:
Note, for Laue–Bragg interferences
Miller indices were introduced in 1839 by the British mineralogist William Hallowes Miller, although an almost identical system (Weiss parameters) had already been used by German mineralogist Christian Samuel Weiss since 1817.[2] The method was also historically known as the Millerian system, and the indices as Millerian,[3] although this is now rare.
The Miller indices are defined with respect to any choice of unit cell and not only with respect to primitive basis vectors, as is sometimes stated.

There are two equivalent ways to define the meaning of the Miller indices:[1] via a point in the reciprocal lattice, or as the inverse intercepts along the lattice vectors. Both definitions are given below. In either case, one needs to choose the three lattice vectors a1, a2, and a3 that define the unit cell (note that the conventional unit cell may be larger than the primitive cell of the Bravais lattice, as the examples below illustrate). Given these, the three primitive reciprocal lattice vectors are also determined (denoted b1, b2, and b3).
Then, given the three Miller indices h, k, l, (hkl) denotes planes orthogonal to the reciprocal lattice vector: That is, (hkl) simply indicates a normal to the planes in the basis of the primitive reciprocal lattice vectors. Because the coordinates are integers, this normal is itself always a reciprocal lattice vector. The requirement of lowest terms means that it is the shortest reciprocal lattice vector in the given direction.
Equivalently, (hkl) denotes a plane that intercepts the three points a1/h, a2/k, and a3/l, or some multiple thereof. That is, the Miller indices are proportional to the inverses of the intercepts of the plane, in the basis of the lattice vectors. If one of the indices is zero, it means that the planes do not intersect that axis (the intercept is "at infinity").
Considering only (hkl) planes intersecting one or more lattice points (the lattice planes), the perpendicular distance d between adjacent lattice planes is related to the (shortest) reciprocal lattice vector orthogonal to the planes by the formula:[1]
The related notation [hkl] denotes the direction: That is, it uses the direct lattice basis instead of the reciprocal lattice. Note that [hkl] is not generally normal to the (hkl) planes, except in a cubic lattice as described below.
For the special case of simple cubic crystals, the lattice vectors are orthogonal and of equal length (usually denoted a), as are those of the reciprocal lattice. Thus, in this common case, the Miller indices (hkl) and [hkl] both simply denote normals/directions in Cartesian coordinates.
For cubic crystals with lattice constant a, the spacing d between adjacent (hkl) lattice planes is (from above)
Because of the symmetry of cubic crystals, it is possible to change the place and sign of the integers and have equivalent directions and planes:
For face-centered cubic and body-centered cubic lattices, the primitive lattice vectors are not orthogonal. However, in these cases the Miller indices are conventionally defined relative to the lattice vectors of the cubic supercell and hence are again simply the Cartesian directions.

For hexagonal and rhombohedral lattice systems, the Bravais–Miller system is typically used, which uses four indices (h k i l) that obey the constraint Here h, k and l are identical to the corresponding Miller indices, and i is a redundant index.
This four-index scheme for labeling planes in a hexagonal lattice makes permutation symmetries apparent. For example, the similarity between (110) ≡ (1120) and (120) ≡ (1210) is more obvious when the redundant index is shown.
In the figure at right, the (001) plane has a 3-fold symmetry: it remains unchanged by a rotation of 1/3 (2π/3 rad, 120°). The [100], [010] and the [110] directions are really similar. If S is the intercept of the plane with the [110] axis, then
There are also ad hoc schemes (e.g. in the transmission electron microscopy literature) for indexing hexagonal lattice vectors (rather than reciprocal lattice vectors or planes) with four indices. However they do not operate by similarly adding a redundant index to the regular three-index set.
For example, the reciprocal lattice vector (hkl) as suggested above can be written in terms of reciprocal lattice vectors as For hexagonal crystals this may be expressed in terms of direct-lattice basis-vectors a1, a2 and a3 as
Hence zone indices of the direction perpendicular to plane (hkl) are, in suitably normalized triplet form, simply When four indices are used for the zone normal to plane (hkl), however, the literature often uses instead.[4] Thus as you can see, four-index zone indices in square or angle brackets sometimes mix a single direct-lattice index on the right with reciprocal-lattice indices (normally in round or curly brackets) on the left.
And, note that for hexagonal interplanar distances, they take the form However, in general:
This section needs more citations. (July 2019) |

Crystallographic directions are lines linking nodes (atoms, ions or molecules) of a crystal. Similarly, crystallographic planes are planes linking nodes. Some directions and planes have a higher density of nodes; these dense planes have an influence on the behavior of the crystal:
For all these reasons, it is important to determine the planes and thus to have a notation system.
Ordinarily, Miller indices are always integers by definition, and this constraint is physically significant. To understand this, suppose that we allow a plane (abc) where the Miller "indices" a, b and c (defined as above) are not necessarily integers.
If a, b and c have rational ratios, then the same family of planes can be written in terms of integer indices (hkl) by scaling a, b and c appropriately: divide by the largest of the three numbers, and then multiply by the least common denominator. Thus, integer Miller indices implicitly include indices with all rational ratios. The reason why planes where the components (in the reciprocal-lattice basis) have rational ratios are of special interest is that these are the lattice planes: they are the only planes whose intersections with the crystal are 2d-periodic.
For a plane (abc) where a, b and c have irrational ratios, on the other hand, the intersection of the plane with the crystal is not periodic. It forms an aperiodic pattern known as a quasicrystal. This construction corresponds precisely to the standard "cut-and-project" method of defining a quasicrystal, using a plane with irrational-ratio Miller indices. (Although many quasicrystals, such as the Penrose tiling, are formed by "cuts" of periodic lattices in more than three dimensions, involving the intersection of more than one such hyperplane.)
Source: Wikipedia. Article content is retrieved live through the MediaWiki API.
Miller indices form a notation system in crystallography for lattice planes in crystal (Bravais) lattices. In particular, a family of lattice planes of a given (direct) Bravais lattice is determined by three integers h, k, and l, the Miller indices. They are written (hkl), and denote the family of (parallel) lattice planes (of the given Bravais lattice) orthogonal to g h k ℓ = h b 1 + k b 2 + ℓ b 3 , {\displaystyle \mathbf {g} _{hk\ell }=h\mathbf {b} _{1}+k\mathbf {b} _{2}+\ell \mathbf {b} _{3},} where bi are the basis or primitive translation vectors of the reciprocal lattice for the given Bravais lattice. (Note that the plane is not always orthogonal to the linear combination of direct or original lattice vectors h a 1 + k a 2 + ℓ a 3 {\displaystyle h\mathbf {a} _{1}+k\mathbf {a} _{2}+\ell \mathbf {a} _{3}} because the direct lattice vectors need not be mutually orthogonal.) This is based on the fact that a reciprocal lattice vector g (the vector indicating a reciprocal lattice point from the reciprocal lattice origin) is the wavevector of a plane wave in the Fourier series of a spatial function (e.g., electronic density function) which periodicity follows the original Bravais lattice, so wavefronts of the plane wave are coincident with parallel lattice planes of the original lattice. Since a measured scattering vector in X-ray crystallography, Δ k = k o u t − k i n {\displaystyle \Delta \mathbf {k} =\mathbf {k} _{\mathrm {out} }-\mathbf {k} _{\mathrm {in} }} with kout as the outgoing (scattered from a crystal lattice) X-ray wavevector and kin as the incoming (toward the crystal lattice) X-ray wavevector, is equal to a reciprocal lattice vector g as stated by the Laue equations, the measured scattered X-ray peak at each measured scattering vector Δk is marked by Miller indices. By convention, negative integers are written with a bar, as in 3 for −3. The integers are usually written in lowest terms, i.e. their greatest common divisor should be 1. Miller indices are also used to designate reflections in X-ray crystallography. In this case the integers are not necessarily in lowest terms, and can be thought of as corresponding to planes spaced such that the reflections from adjacent planes would have a phase difference of exactly one wavelength (2π), regardless of whether there are atoms on all these planes or not. There are also several related notations: the notation {hkl} denotes the set of all planes that are equivalent to (hkl) by the symmetry of the lattice. In the context of crystal directions (not planes), the corresponding notations are: [hkl], with square instead of round brackets, denotes a direction in the basis of the direct lattice vectors instead of the reciprocal lattice; and similarly, the notation ⟨hkl⟩ denotes the set of all directions that are equivalent to [hkl] by symmetry. Note, for Laue–Bragg interferences hkl lacks any bracketing when designating a reflection Miller indices were introduced in 1839 by the British mineralogist William Hallowes Miller, although an almost identical system (Weiss parameters) had already been used by German mineralogist Christian Samuel Weiss since 1817. The method was also historically known as the Millerian system, and the indices as Millerian, although this is now rare. The Miller indices are defined with respect to any choice of unit cell and not only with respect to primitive basis vectors, as is sometimes stated.
In crystallography and solid state physics, the Laue equations relate incoming waves to outgoing waves in the process of elastic scattering, where the photon energy or light temporal frequency does not change upon scattering by a crystal lattice. They are named after physicist Max von Laue (1879–1960). The Laue equations can be written as Δ k = k o u t − k i n = G {\displaystyle \mathbf {\Delta k} =\mathbf {k} _{\mathrm {out} }-\mathbf {k} _{\mathrm {in} }=\mathbf {G} } as the condition of elastic wave scattering by a crystal lattice, where Δ k {\displaystyle \mathbf {\Delta k} } is the scattering vector, k i n {\displaystyle \mathbf {k} _{\mathrm {in} }} , k o u t {\displaystyle \mathbf {k} _{\mathrm {out} }} are incoming and outgoing wave vectors (to the crystal and from the crystal, by scattering), and G {\displaystyle \mathbf {G} } is a crystal reciprocal lattice vector. Due to elastic scattering | k o u t | 2 = | k i n | 2 {\displaystyle |\mathbf {k} _{\mathrm {out} }|^{2}=|\mathbf {k} _{\mathrm {in} }|^{2}} . The three vectors ( G {\displaystyle \mathbf {G} } , k o u t {\displaystyle \mathbf {k} _{\mathrm {out} }} , and − k i n {\displaystyle -\mathbf {k} _{\mathrm {in} }} ) form a rhombus if the equation is satisfied. If the scattering satisfies this equation, all the crystal lattice points scatter the incoming wave toward the scattering direction (the direction along k o u t {\displaystyle \mathbf {k} _{\mathrm {out} }} ). If the equation is not satisfied, then for any scattering direction, only some lattice points scatter the incoming wave. (This physical interpretation of the equation is based on the assumption that scattering at a lattice point is made in a way that the scattering wave and the incoming wave have the same phase at the point.) It also can be seen as the conservation of momentum as ℏ k o u t = ℏ k i n + ℏ G {\displaystyle \hbar \mathbf {k} _{\mathrm {out} }=\hbar \mathbf {k} _{\mathrm {in} }+\hbar \mathbf {G} } since G {\displaystyle \mathbf {G} } is the wave vector for a plane wave associated with parallel crystal lattice planes. (Wavefronts of the plane wave are coincident with these lattice planes.) The equations are equivalent to Bragg's law; the Laue equations are vector equations while Bragg's law is in a form that is easier to solve, but these tell the same content.
In particle physics, wave mechanics, and optics, momentum transfer is the amount of momentum that one particle gives to another particle. It is also called the scattering vector as it describes the transfer of wavevector in wave mechanics. In the simplest example of scattering of two colliding particles with initial momenta p → i 1 , p → i 2 {\displaystyle {\vec {p}}_{i1},{\vec {p}}_{i2}} , resulting in final momenta p → f 1 , p → f 2 {\displaystyle {\vec {p}}_{f1},{\vec {p}}_{f2}} , the momentum transfer is given by q → = p → i 1 − p → f 1 = p → f 2 − p → i 2 {\displaystyle {\vec {q}}={\vec {p}}_{i1}-{\vec {p}}_{f1}={\vec {p}}_{f2}-{\vec {p}}_{i2}} where the last identity expresses momentum conservation. Momentum transfer is an important quantity because Δ x = ℏ / | q | {\displaystyle \Delta x=\hbar /|q|} is a better measure for the typical distance resolution of the reaction than the momenta themselves.
The Debye–Waller factor (DWF), named after Peter Debye and Ivar Waller, is used in condensed matter physics to describe the attenuation of x-ray scattering or coherent neutron scattering caused by thermal motion. It is also called the temperature factor. Often, "Debye–Waller factor" is used as a generic term that comprises the Lamb–Mössbauer factor of incoherent neutron scattering and Mössbauer spectroscopy. The DWF depends on the scattering vector q. For a given q, DWF(q) 2 {\displaystyle ^{2}} gives the fraction of elastic scattering; 1 – DWF(q) 2 {\displaystyle ^{2}} correspondingly gives the fraction of inelastic scattering (strictly speaking, this probability interpretation is not true in general). In diffraction studies, only the elastic scattering is useful; in crystals, it gives rise to distinct Bragg reflection peaks. Inelastic scattering events are undesirable as they cause a diffuse background — unless the energies of scattered particles are analysed, in which case they carry valuable information (for instance in inelastic neutron scattering or electron energy loss spectroscopy). The basic expression for the DWF is given by DWF = ⟨ exp ( i q ⋅ u ) ⟩ {\displaystyle {\text{DWF}}=\left\langle \exp \left(i\mathbf {q} \cdot \mathbf {u} \right)\right\rangle } where u is the displacement of a scattering center, and ⟨ … ⟩ {\displaystyle \langle \ldots \rangle } denotes either thermal or time averaging. Assuming harmonicity of the scattering centers in the material under study, the Boltzmann distribution implies that q ⋅ u {\displaystyle \mathbf {q} \cdot \mathbf {u} } is normally distributed with zero mean. Then, using for example the expression of the corresponding characteristic function, the DWF takes the form DWF = exp ( − ⟨ [ q ⋅ u ] 2 ⟩ / 2 ) {\displaystyle {\text{DWF}}=\exp \left(-\langle [\mathbf {q} \cdot \mathbf {u} ]^{2}\rangle /2\right)} Note that although the above reasoning is classical, the same holds in quantum mechanics. Assuming also isotropy of the harmonic potential, one may write DWF = exp ( − q 2 ⟨ u 2 ⟩ / 2 ) {\displaystyle {\text{DWF}}=\exp \left(-q^{2}\langle u^{2}\rangle /2\right)} where q, u are the magnitudes (or absolute values) of the vectors q, u respectively, and ⟨ u 2 ⟩ {\displaystyle \langle u^{2}\rangle } is the mean squared displacement. In crystallographic publications, values of U {\displaystyle U} are often given where U = ⟨ u 2 ⟩ {\displaystyle U=\langle u^{2}\rangle } . Note that if the incident wave has wavelength λ {\displaystyle \lambda } , and it is elastically scattered by an angle of 2 θ {\displaystyle 2\theta } , then q = 4 π sin ( θ ) λ {\displaystyle q={\frac {4\pi \sin(\theta )}{\lambda }}} In the context of protein structures, the term B-factor is used. The B-factor is defined as B = 8 π 2 ⟨ u 2 ⟩ {\displaystyle B={8\pi ^{2}}\langle u^{2}\rangle } It is measured in units of Å2. The B-factors can be taken as indicating the relative vibrational motion of different parts of the structure. Atoms with low B-factors belong to a part of the structure that is well ordered. Atoms with large B-factors generally belong to part of the structure that is very flexible. Each ATOM record (PDB file format) of a crystal structure deposited with the Protein Data Bank contains a B-factor for that atom.
Before the 1921 destruction of Tulsa’s Greenwood District, Black residents had created a remarkable center of business and community life. The district included stores, professional offices, entertainment venues and homes owned by Black citizens. Understanding Greenwood means learning what was built—not only what was burned.
MORE →Joe Louis.