q2K BHP
Black History Portal
THE BHP WIRE —
HIDDEN TRUTHS
What's New!
THE JOURNEY THROUGH TIME

Explore Black History

Explore the people, places, events, achievements, struggles and stories that shaped our journey.

✊🏾

Civil Rights

Movements, leaders, victories and the continuing fight for equality.

⚙️

Black Inventors

Innovation, patents, science, technology and world-changing contributions.

🏆

Sports

Pioneers, champions, Negro Leagues, records, activism and excellence.

♟️

People

Meet the people whose lives, choices and achievements shaped the journey.

📍

Places

Black towns, communities, institutions and places where history happened.

📜

Events

Moments that changed communities, movements, institutions and the nation.

Enter a person, place, event, or topic.
MY'STORY

The MOVE Fire

This is a personal recollection on the Move fire on May 13, 1985 Philadelphia police fired thousands of rounds at the MOVE house, city officials approved dropping an explosive device on the roof, the resulting fire was allowed to burn, 11 people—including five children—died, and 61 homes were destroyed. Philadelphia City Council later called it a “brutal attack carried out by the City of Philadelphia on its own citizens” and acknowledged that no individual faced criminal consequences for the bombing. One timeline correction worth preserving for the BHP record: the major previous MOVE-police confrontation was August 8, 1978, about seven years before the bombing, not a year or two earlier. Officer James Ramp was killed, other police and firefighters were wounded, nine MOVE members were later convicted, and television cameras recorded police beating Delbert Africa during his arrest. The 1985 MOVE Commission later specifically criticized city planners for failing to adequately use lessons from that 1978 confrontation. And that actually strengthens the point you’re making: 1985 did not happen without precedent or institutional memory. There had already been a deadly confrontation with MOVE, years of conflict, negotiations and police involvement before Osage Avenue.

MORE →
BLACK FACTS
The Truths They Never Taught You...

Wilmington 1898 — An American Coup

Wilmington, North Carolina once had a thriving Black middle class and an elected interracial government. In 1898 white supremacists used violence to overthrow that government, kill Black residents and drive many others from the city.

MORE →
BHP gathered finds from its connected research sources. Showing the 4 strongest Black History matches.
← BACK TO RESULTS
Wikipedia

Normal subgroup

In abstract algebra, a normal subgroup (also known as an invariant subgroup or self-conjugate subgroup)[1] is a subgroup that is invariant under conjugation by members of the group of which it is a part. In other words, a subgroup of the group is normal in if and only if for all and The usual notation for this relation is

Normal subgroups are important because they (and only they) can be used to construct quotient groups of the given group. Furthermore, the normal subgroups of are precisely the kernels of group homomorphisms with domain which means that they can be used to internally classify those homomorphisms.

Évariste Galois was the first to realize the importance of the existence of normal subgroups.[2]

Definitions

[edit]

A subgroup of a group is called a normal subgroup of if it is invariant under conjugation; that is, the conjugation of an element of by an element of is always in [3] The usual notation for this relation is

Equivalent conditions

[edit]

For any subgroup of the following conditions are equivalent to being a normal subgroup of Therefore, any one of them may be taken as the definition.

  • The image of conjugation of by any element of is a subset of [4] i.e., for all .
  • The image of conjugation of by any element of is equal to [4] i.e., for all .
  • For all the left and right cosets and are equal.[4]
  • The sets of left and right cosets of in coincide.[4]
  • Multiplication in preserves the equivalence relation "is in the same left coset as". That is, for every satisfying and , we have
  • There exists a group on the set of left cosets of where multiplication of any two left cosets and yields the left coset . (This group is called the quotient group of modulo , denoted .)
  • is a union of conjugacy classes of [2]
  • is preserved by the inner automorphisms of [5]
  • There is some group homomorphism whose kernel is [2]
  • There exists a group homomorphism whose fibers form a group where the identity element is and multiplication of any two fibers and yields the fiber . (This group is the same group mentioned above.)
  • There is some congruence relation on for which the equivalence class of the identity element is .
  • For all and the commutator is in [citation needed]
  • Any two elements commute modulo the normal subgroup membership relation. That is, for all if and only if [citation needed]

Examples

[edit]

For any group the trivial subgroup consisting of just the identity element of is always a normal subgroup of Likewise, itself is always a normal subgroup of (If these are the only normal subgroups, then is said to be simple.)[6] Other named normal subgroups of an arbitrary group include the center of the group (the set of elements that commute with all other elements) and the commutator subgroup [7][8] More generally, since conjugation is an isomorphism, any characteristic subgroup is a normal subgroup.[9]

If is an abelian group then every subgroup of is normal, because More generally, for any group , every subgroup of the center of is normal in . (In the special case that is abelian, the center is all of , hence the fact that all subgroups of an abelian group are normal.) A group that is not abelian but for which every subgroup is normal is called a Hamiltonian group.[10]

A concrete example of a normal subgroup is the subgroup of the symmetric group consisting of the identity and both three-cycles. In particular, one can check that every coset of is either equal to itself or is equal to On the other hand, the subgroup is not normal in since [11] This illustrates the general fact that any subgroup of index two is normal.

As an example of a normal subgroup within a matrix group, consider the general linear group of all invertible matrices with real entries under the operation of matrix multiplication and its subgroup of all matrices of determinant 1 (the special linear group). To see why the subgroup is normal in , consider any matrix in and any invertible matrix . Then using the two important identities and , one has that , and so as well. This means is closed under conjugation in , so it is a normal subgroup.[a]

In the Rubik's Cube group, the subgroups consisting of operations which only affect the orientations of either the corner pieces or the edge pieces are normal.[12]

The translation group is a normal subgroup of the Euclidean group in any dimension.[13] This means: applying a rigid transformation, followed by a translation and then the inverse rigid transformation, has the same effect as a single translation. By contrast, the subgroup of all rotations about the origin is not a normal subgroup of the Euclidean group, as long as the dimension is at least 2: first translating, then rotating about the origin, and then translating back will typically not fix the origin and will therefore not have the same effect as a single rotation about the origin.

Properties

[edit]
  • If is a normal subgroup of and is a subgroup of containing then is a normal subgroup of [14]
  • A normal subgroup of a normal subgroup of a group need not be normal in the group. That is, normality is not a transitive relation. The smallest group exhibiting this phenomenon is the dihedral group of order 8.[15] However, a characteristic subgroup of a normal subgroup is normal.[16] A group in which normality is transitive is called a T-group.[17]
  • The two groups and are normal subgroups of their direct product
  • If the group is a semidirect product then is normal in though need not be normal in
  • If and are normal subgroups of an additive group such that and , then [18]
  • Normality is preserved under surjective homomorphisms;[19] that is, if is a surjective group homomorphism and is normal in then the image is normal in
  • Normality is preserved by taking inverse images;[19] that is, if is a group homomorphism and is normal in then the inverse image is normal in
  • Normality is preserved on taking direct products;[20] that is, if and then
  • Every subgroup of index 2 is normal. More generally, a subgroup, of finite index, in contains a subgroup, normal in and of index dividing called the normal core. In particular, if is the smallest prime dividing the order of then every subgroup of index is normal.[21]
  • The fact that normal subgroups of are precisely the kernels of group homomorphisms defined on accounts for some of the importance of normal subgroups; they are a way to internally classify all homomorphisms defined on a group. For example, a non-identity finite group is simple if and only if it is isomorphic to all of its non-identity homomorphic images,[22] a finite group is perfect if and only if it has no normal subgroups of prime index, and a group is imperfect if and only if the derived subgroup is not supplemented by any proper normal subgroup.

Lattice of normal subgroups

[edit]

Given two normal subgroups, and of their intersection and their product are also normal subgroups of

The normal subgroups of form a lattice under subset inclusion with least element, and greatest element, The meet of two normal subgroups, and in this lattice is their intersection and the join is their product.

The lattice is complete and modular.[20]

Normal subgroups, quotient groups and homomorphisms

[edit]

If is a normal subgroup, we can define a multiplication on cosets as follows: This relation defines a mapping To show that this mapping is well-defined, one needs to prove that the choice of representative elements does not affect the result. To this end, consider some other representative elements Then there are such that It follows that where we also used the fact that is a normal subgroup, and therefore there is such that This proves that this product is a well-defined mapping between cosets.

With this operation, the set of cosets is itself a group, called the quotient group and denoted with There is a natural homomorphism, given by This homomorphism maps into the identity element of which is the coset [23] that is,

In general, a group homomorphism, sends subgroups of to subgroups of Also, the preimage of any subgroup of is a subgroup of We call the preimage of the trivial group in the kernel of the homomorphism and denote it by As it turns out, the kernel is always normal and the image of is always isomorphic to (the first isomorphism theorem).[24] In fact, this correspondence is a bijection between the set of all quotient groups of and the set of all homomorphic images of (up to isomorphism).[25] It is also easy to see that the kernel of the quotient map, is itself, so the normal subgroups are precisely the kernels of homomorphisms with domain [26]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ In other language: is a homomorphism from to the multiplicative subgroup , and is the kernel. Both arguments also work over the complex numbers, or indeed over an arbitrary field.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Bradley 2010, p. 12.
  2. ^ a b c Cantrell 2000, p. 160.
  3. ^ Dummit & Foote 2004.
  4. ^ a b c d Hungerford 2003, p. 41.
  5. ^ Fraleigh 2003, p. 141.
  6. ^ Robinson 1996, p. 16.
  7. ^ Hungerford 2003, p. 45.
  8. ^ Hall 1999, p. 138.
  9. ^ Hall 1999, p. 32.
  10. ^ Hall 1999, p. 190.
  11. ^ Judson 2020, Section 10.1.
  12. ^ Bergvall et al. 2010, p. 96.
  13. ^ Thurston 1997, p. 218.
  14. ^ Hungerford 2003, p. 42.
  15. ^ Robinson 1996, p. 17.
  16. ^ Robinson 1996, p. 28.
  17. ^ Robinson 1996, p. 402.
  18. ^ Hungerford 2013, p. 290.
  19. ^ a b Hall 1999, p. 29.
  20. ^ a b Hungerford 2003, p. 46.
  21. ^ Robinson 1996, p. 36.
  22. ^ Dõmõsi & Nehaniv 2004, p. 7.
  23. ^ Hungerford 2003, pp. 42–43.
  24. ^ Hungerford 2003, p. 44.
  25. ^ Robinson 1996, p. 20.
  26. ^ Hall 1999, p. 27.

Bibliography

[edit]
  • Bergvall, Olof; Hynning, Elin; Hedberg, Mikael; Mickelin, Joel; Masawe, Patrick (16 May 2010). "On Rubik's Cube" (PDF). KTH.
  • Cantrell, C.D. (2000). Modern Mathematical Methods for Physicists and Engineers. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-59180-5.
  • Dõmõsi, Pál; Nehaniv, Chrystopher L. (2004). Algebraic Theory of Automata Networks. SIAM Monographs on Discrete Mathematics and Applications. SIAM.
  • Dummit, David S.; Foote, Richard M. (2004). Abstract Algebra (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 0-471-43334-9.
  • Fraleigh, John B. (2003). A First Course in Abstract Algebra (7th ed.). Addison-Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-15608-2.
  • Hall, Marshall (1999). The Theory of Groups. Providence: Chelsea Publishing. ISBN 978-0-8218-1967-8.
  • Hungerford, Thomas (2003). Algebra. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer.
  • Hungerford, Thomas (2013). Abstract Algebra: An Introduction. Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning.
  • Judson, Thomas W. (2020). Abstract Algebra: Theory and Applications.
  • Robinson, Derek J. S. (1996). A Course in the Theory of Groups. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Vol. 80 (2nd ed.). Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-1-4612-6443-9. Zbl 0836.20001.
  • Thurston, William (1997). Levy, Silvio (ed.). Three-dimensional geometry and topology, Vol. 1. Princeton Mathematical Series. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-08304-9.
  • Bradley, C. J. (2010). The mathematical theory of symmetry in solids : representation theory for point groups and space groups. Oxford New York: Clarendon Press. ISBN 978-0-19-958258-7. OCLC 859155300.

Further reading

[edit]
  • I. N. Herstein, Topics in algebra. Second edition. Xerox College Publishing, Lexington, Mass.-Toronto, Ont., 1975. xi+388 pp.
[edit]

Source: Wikipedia. Article content is retrieved live through the MediaWiki API.

Wikipedia

Subgroup

In group theory, a branch of mathematics, a subset of a group G is a subgroup of G if the members of that subset form a group with respect to the group operation in G. Formally, given a group G under a binary operation ∗, a subset H of G is called a subgroup of G if H also forms a group under the operation ∗. More precisely, H is a subgroup of G if the restriction of ∗ to H × H is a group operation on H. This is often denoted H ≤ G, read as "H is a subgroup of G". The trivial subgroup of any group is the subgroup {e} consisting of just the identity element. A proper subgroup of a group G is a subgroup H which is a proper subset of G (that is, H ≠ G). This is often represented notationally by H < G, read as "H is a proper subgroup of G". Some authors also exclude the trivial group from being proper (that is, H ≠ {e}​). If H is a subgroup of G, then G is sometimes called an overgroup of H. The same definitions apply more generally when G is an arbitrary semigroup, but this article will only deal with subgroups of groups.

MORE →
Wikipedia

Normal subgroup

In abstract algebra, a normal subgroup (also known as an invariant subgroup or self-conjugate subgroup) is a subgroup that is invariant under conjugation by members of the group of which it is a part. In other words, a subgroup N {\displaystyle N} of the group G {\displaystyle G} is normal in G {\displaystyle G} if and only if g n g − 1 ∈ N {\displaystyle gng^{-1}\in N} for all g ∈ G {\displaystyle g\in G} and n ∈ N . {\displaystyle n\in N.} The usual notation for this relation is N ◃ G . {\displaystyle N\triangleleft G.} Normal subgroups are important because they (and only they) can be used to construct quotient groups of the given group. Furthermore, the normal subgroups of G {\displaystyle G} are precisely the kernels of group homomorphisms with domain G , {\displaystyle G,} which means that they can be used to internally classify those homomorphisms. Évariste Galois was the first to realize the importance of the existence of normal subgroups.

MORE →
No preview image
Wikipedia

Commutator subgroup

In mathematics, more specifically in abstract algebra, the commutator subgroup or derived subgroup of a group is the subgroup generated by all the commutators of the group. The commutator subgroup is important because it is the smallest normal subgroup such that the quotient group of the original group by this subgroup is abelian. In other words, G / N {\displaystyle G/N} is abelian if and only if N {\displaystyle N} contains the commutator subgroup of G {\displaystyle G} . So in some sense it provides a measure of how far the group is from being abelian; the larger the commutator subgroup is, the "less abelian" the group is.

MORE →
No preview image
Wikipedia

Torsion subgroup

In the theory of abelian groups, the torsion subgroup A T {\displaystyle A_{T}} of an abelian group A {\displaystyle A} is the subgroup of A {\displaystyle A} consisting of all elements that have finite order (the torsion elements of A {\displaystyle A} ). An abelian group A {\displaystyle A} is called a torsion group (or periodic group) if every element of A {\displaystyle A} has finite order and is called torsion-free if every element of A {\displaystyle A} except the identity is of infinite order. The proof that A T {\displaystyle A_{T}} is closed under the group operation relies on the commutativity of the operation (see examples section). If A {\displaystyle A} is abelian, then the torsion subgroup T {\displaystyle T} is a fully characteristic subgroup of A {\displaystyle A} and the factor group A / T {\displaystyle A/T} is torsion-free. There is a covariant functor from the category of abelian groups to the category of torsion groups that sends every group to its torsion subgroup and every homomorphism to its restriction to the torsion subgroup. There is another covariant functor from the category of abelian groups to the category of torsion-free groups that sends every group to its quotient by its torsion subgroup, and sends every homomorphism to the obvious induced homomorphism (which is easily seen to be well-defined). If A {\displaystyle A} is finitely generated and abelian, then it can be written as the direct sum of its torsion subgroup T {\displaystyle T} and a torsion-free subgroup (but this is not true for all infinitely generated abelian groups). In any decomposition of A {\displaystyle A} as a direct sum of a torsion subgroup S {\displaystyle S} and a torsion-free subgroup, S {\displaystyle S} must equal T {\displaystyle T} (but the torsion-free subgroup is not uniquely determined). This is a key step in the classification of finitely generated abelian groups.

MORE →
TOPIC OF THE DAY

Greenwood / Black Wall Street

Before the 1921 destruction of Tulsa’s Greenwood District, Black residents had created a remarkable center of business and community life. The district included stores, professional offices, entertainment venues and homes owned by Black citizens. Understanding Greenwood means learning what was built—not only what was burned.

MORE →
TRIVIA QUESTION OF THE DAY

What prosperous Tulsa district became widely known as “Black Wall Street”?

The Greenwood District.