q2K BHP
Black History Portal
THE BHP WIRE —
HIDDEN TRUTHS
What's New!
THE JOURNEY THROUGH TIME

Explore Black History

Explore the people, places, events, achievements, struggles and stories that shaped our journey.

✊🏾

Civil Rights

Movements, leaders, victories and the continuing fight for equality.

⚙️

Black Inventors

Innovation, patents, science, technology and world-changing contributions.

🏆

Sports

Pioneers, champions, Negro Leagues, records, activism and excellence.

♟️

People

Meet the people whose lives, choices and achievements shaped the journey.

📍

Places

Black towns, communities, institutions and places where history happened.

📜

Events

Moments that changed communities, movements, institutions and the nation.

Enter a person, place, event, or topic.
MY'STORY

The MOVE Fire

This is a personal recollection on the Move fire on May 13, 1985 Philadelphia police fired thousands of rounds at the MOVE house, city officials approved dropping an explosive device on the roof, the resulting fire was allowed to burn, 11 people—including five children—died, and 61 homes were destroyed. Philadelphia City Council later called it a “brutal attack carried out by the City of Philadelphia on its own citizens” and acknowledged that no individual faced criminal consequences for the bombing. One timeline correction worth preserving for the BHP record: the major previous MOVE-police confrontation was August 8, 1978, about seven years before the bombing, not a year or two earlier. Officer James Ramp was killed, other police and firefighters were wounded, nine MOVE members were later convicted, and television cameras recorded police beating Delbert Africa during his arrest. The 1985 MOVE Commission later specifically criticized city planners for failing to adequately use lessons from that 1978 confrontation. And that actually strengthens the point you’re making: 1985 did not happen without precedent or institutional memory. There had already been a deadly confrontation with MOVE, years of conflict, negotiations and police involvement before Osage Avenue.

MORE →
BLACK FACTS
The Truths They Never Taught You...

Shirley Chisholm — Unbought and Unbossed

In 1968 Shirley Chisholm became the first Black woman elected to the United States Congress. In 1972 she launched a campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination, breaking another political barrier.

MORE →
BHP gathered finds from its connected research sources. Showing the 4 strongest Black History matches.
No preview image
Wikipedia

Inclusion order

In the mathematical field of order theory, an inclusion order is the partial order that arises as the subset-inclusion relation on some collection of objects. In a simple way, every poset P = (X,≤) is (isomorphic to) an inclusion order (just as every group is isomorphic to a permutation group – see Cayley's theorem). To see this, associate to each element x of X the set X ≤ ( x ) = { y ∈ X ∣ y ≤ x } ; {\displaystyle X_{\leq (x)}=\{y\in X\mid y\leq x\};} then the transitivity of ≤ ensures that for all a and b in X, we have X ≤ ( a ) ⊆ X ≤ ( b ) precisely when a ≤ b . {\displaystyle X_{\leq (a)}\subseteq X_{\leq (b)}{\text{ precisely when }}a\leq b.} There can be sets S {\displaystyle S} of cardinality less than | X | {\displaystyle |X|} such that P is isomorphic to the inclusion order on S. The size of the smallest possible S is called the 2-dimension of P. Several important classes of poset arise as inclusion orders for some natural collections, like the Boolean lattice Qn, which is the collection of all 2n subsets of an n-element set, the interval-containment orders, which are precisely the orders of order dimension at most two, and the dimension-n orders, which are the containment orders on collections of n-boxes anchored at the origin. Other containment orders that are interesting in their own right include the circle orders, which arise from disks in the plane, and the angle orders.

MORE →
Wikipedia

Ultrafilter on a set

In the mathematical field of set theory, an ultrafilter on a set X {\displaystyle X} is a maximal filter on the set X . {\displaystyle X.} In other words, it is a collection of subsets of X {\displaystyle X} that satisfies the definition of a filter on X {\displaystyle X} and that is maximal with respect to inclusion, in the sense that there does not exist a strictly larger collection of subsets of X {\displaystyle X} that is also a filter. (In the above, by definition a filter on a set does not contain the empty set.) Equivalently, an ultrafilter on the set X {\displaystyle X} can also be characterized as a filter on X {\displaystyle X} with the property that for every subset A {\displaystyle A} of X {\displaystyle X} either A {\displaystyle A} or its complement X ∖ A {\displaystyle X\setminus A} belongs to the ultrafilter. Ultrafilters on sets are an important special instance of ultrafilters on partially ordered sets, where the partially ordered set consists of the power set P ( X ) {\displaystyle {\mathcal {P}}(X)} and the partial order is subset inclusion ⊆ . {\displaystyle \,\subseteq .} This article deals specifically with ultrafilters on a set and does not cover the more general notion. There are two types of ultrafilter on a set. A principal ultrafilter on X {\displaystyle X} is the collection of all subsets of X {\displaystyle X} that contain a fixed element x ∈ X {\displaystyle x\in X} . The ultrafilters that are not principal are the free ultrafilters. The existence of free ultrafilters on any infinite set is implied by the ultrafilter lemma, which can be proven in ZFC. On the other hand, there exist models of ZF where every ultrafilter on a set is principal. Ultrafilters have many applications in set theory, model theory, and topology. Usually, only free ultrafilters lead to non-trivial constructions. For example, an ultraproduct modulo a principal ultrafilter is always isomorphic to one of the factors, while an ultraproduct modulo a free ultrafilter usually has a more complex structure.

MORE →
Wikipedia

Subset

In mathematics, a set A is a subset of a set B if and only if all elements of A are also elements of B; B is then a superset of A. It is possible for A and B to be equal; if they are unequal, then A is a proper subset of B. The relationship of one set being a subset of another is called inclusion (or sometimes containment). A is a subset of B may also be expressed as B includes (or contains) A or A is included (or contained) in B. A k-subset is a subset with k elements. When quantified, A ⊆ B {\displaystyle A\subseteq B} is represented as ∀ x ( x ∈ A ⇒ x ∈ B ) . {\displaystyle \forall x\left(x\in A\Rightarrow x\in B\right).} One can prove the statement A ⊆ B {\displaystyle A\subseteq B} by applying a proof technique known as the element argument:Let sets A and B be given. To prove that A ⊆ B , {\displaystyle A\subseteq B,} suppose that a is a particular but arbitrarily chosen element of A show that a is an element of B. The validity of this technique can be seen as a consequence of universal generalization: the technique shows ( c ∈ A ) ⇒ ( c ∈ B ) {\displaystyle (c\in A)\Rightarrow (c\in B)} for an arbitrarily chosen element c. Universal generalisation then implies ∀ x ( x ∈ A ⇒ x ∈ B ) , {\displaystyle \forall x\left(x\in A\Rightarrow x\in B\right),} which is equivalent to A ⊆ B , {\displaystyle A\subseteq B,} as stated above.

MORE →
Wikipedia

Inclusion map

In mathematics, if A {\displaystyle A} is a subset of B , {\displaystyle B,} then the inclusion map is the function ι {\displaystyle \iota } that sends each element x {\displaystyle x} of A {\displaystyle A} to x , {\displaystyle x,} treated as an element of B : {\displaystyle B:} ι : A → B , ι ( x ) = x . {\displaystyle \iota :A\rightarrow B,\qquad \iota (x)=x.} An inclusion map may also be referred to as an inclusion function, an insertion, or a canonical injection. A "hooked arrow" (U+21AA ↪ RIGHTWARDS ARROW WITH HOOK) is sometimes used in place of the function arrow above to denote an inclusion map; thus: ι : A ↪ B . {\displaystyle \iota :A\hookrightarrow B.} (However, some authors use this hooked arrow for any embedding.) This and other analogous injective functions from substructures are sometimes called natural injections. Given any morphism f {\displaystyle f} between objects X {\displaystyle X} and Y {\displaystyle Y} , if there is an inclusion map ι : A → X {\displaystyle \iota :A\to X} into the domain X {\displaystyle X} , then one can form the restriction f ∘ ι {\displaystyle f\circ \iota } of f . {\displaystyle f.} In many instances, one can also construct a canonical inclusion into the codomain R → Y {\displaystyle R\to Y} known as the range of f . {\displaystyle f.}

MORE →
TOPIC OF THE DAY

Greenwood / Black Wall Street

Before the 1921 destruction of Tulsa’s Greenwood District, Black residents had created a remarkable center of business and community life. The district included stores, professional offices, entertainment venues and homes owned by Black citizens. Understanding Greenwood means learning what was built—not only what was burned.

MORE →
TRIVIA QUESTION OF THE DAY

Who was the first African-American woman millionaire in the United States?

Madam C.J. Walker